Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #704881
| From | 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed |
| Date | 2015-12-30 03:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qLewN-jb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qKF63-1ST-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
>>>>> "BH" == Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> writes: >> OK, but you are still going to run into problems if the user has set >> >> # apt-config dump|egrep Rec\|Sugg >> APT::Install-Recommends "false"; >> APT::Install-Suggests "0"; BH> Users that do that need to accept that they will encounter errors like BH> this. OK, but I am sure yours is the very first package to "lower the barrier" of https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps in that way. In the past an entire working Debian could be completely installed counting on only Depends. Or maybe https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps needs to have some additional explanation about special cases like this?
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org> - 2015-12-30 03:20 +0100 Bug#809204: busybox is required but not installed Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2015-12-31 04:40 +0100
csiph-web