Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1297046

Re: [PATCH] veth: don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good.

From David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] veth: don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good.
Date 2015-12-22 21:20 +0100
Message-ID <qIBzz-7r-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qH8zE-1cy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qH92F-1o5-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw
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--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] veth: don't modify ip-summed; doing so treats packets with  bad checksums as good. Vijay Pandurangan <vijayp@vijayp.ca> - 2015-12-18 19:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] veth: don't modify ip-summed; doing so treats packets  with bad checksums as good. Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 20:10 +0100
    [PATCH] veth: don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good. Vijay Pandurangan <vijayp@vijayp.ca> - 2015-12-18 20:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] veth: don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good. Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 22:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] veth: don’t modify ip_summed;  doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good. David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-12-22 21:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] veth: don’t modify ip_summed; doing so treats packets with bad checksums as good. Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 19:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] veth: don't modify ip-summed; doing so treats packets  with bad checksums as good. Vijay Pandurangan <vijayp@vijayp.ca> - 2015-12-18 20:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] veth: don't modify ip-summed; doing so treats packets  with bad checksums as good. Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 22:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] veth: don't modify ip-summed; doing so treats packets  with bad checksums as good. Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com> - 2015-12-19 22:40 +0100

csiph-web