Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1292062
| From | Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/6] hlist: prepare for supporting bit spinlock |
| Date | 2015-12-15 12:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qFVXQ-3nl-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qFVXQ-3nl-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
hlist_head is often used for implementing bucket header of
hash table, and one lock is often needed for adding/deleting
node in the bucket list. It can consume lots of memory if
per-bucket spinlock is used, so this patch trys to use the 1st
bit of hlist_head->first as bit lock for this purpose.
bit spinlock isn't efficient as spin lock, but the contention
shouldn't be very high for operating per-bucket hlist, so bit
spinlock should be OK.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/rculist.h | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h
index 14ec165..9fc394a 100644
--- a/include/linux/rculist.h
+++ b/include/linux/rculist.h
@@ -435,6 +435,61 @@ static inline void hlist_replace_rcu(struct hlist_node *old,
#define hlist_next_rcu(node) (*((struct hlist_node __rcu **)(&(node)->next)))
#define hlist_pprev_rcu(node) (*((struct hlist_node __rcu **)((node)->pprev)))
+/*
+ * This bit of hlist_head->first can be used as per-bucket
+ * bit spin_lock in hash table use case, and the lock bit
+ * should always be kept when hlist_node is added, deleted
+ * and other update operations.
+ *
+ * When lock bit is used, only the _lock version of hlist
+ * helpers can be used for operating the hlist.
+ */
+#define HLIST_LOCK_BIT 0
+#define HLIST_LOCK_MASK (1UL << HLIST_LOCK_BIT)
+#define hlist_get_first(h) \
+ (struct hlist_node *)((unsigned long)(h)->first & ~HLIST_LOCK_MASK)
+#define hlist_get_lock(h) ((unsigned long)(h)->first & HLIST_LOCK_MASK)
+#define hlist_make_1st_node(h, n) \
+ (struct hlist_node *)((unsigned long)(n) | hlist_get_lock(h))
+
+static inline struct hlist_head *hlist_get_head_lock(
+ struct hlist_head *head, struct hlist_head *new_head)
+{
+ new_head->first = hlist_get_first(head);
+ return new_head;
+}
+
+static inline void __hlist_del_lock(struct hlist_node *n)
+{
+ struct hlist_node *next = n->next;
+ struct hlist_node **pprev = n->pprev;
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(*pprev, (unsigned long)next |
+ ((unsigned long)*pprev & HLIST_LOCK_MASK));
+ if (next)
+ next->pprev = pprev;
+}
+
+/* The bit lock should be held before calling this helper */
+static inline void hlist_del_rcu_lock(struct hlist_node *n)
+{
+ __hlist_del_lock(n);
+ n->pprev = LIST_POISON2;
+}
+
+/* The bit lock should be held before calling this helper */
+static inline void hlist_add_head_rcu_lock(struct hlist_node *n,
+ struct hlist_head *h)
+{
+ struct hlist_node *first = hlist_get_first(h);
+
+ n->next = first;
+ n->pprev = &h->first;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(hlist_first_rcu(h), hlist_make_1st_node(h, n));
+ if (first)
+ first->pprev = &n->next;
+}
+
/**
* hlist_add_head_rcu
* @n: the element to add to the hash list.
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/6] bpf: hash: optimization Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 12:30 +0100
[PATCH 6/6] bpf: hash: reorganize 'struct htab_elem' Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 12:30 +0100
[PATCH 5/6] bpf: hash: avoid to call kmalloc() in eBPF prog Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 5/6] bpf: hash: avoid to call kmalloc() in eBPF prog Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 00:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 5/6] bpf: hash: avoid to call kmalloc() in eBPF prog Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2015-12-16 00:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 5/6] bpf: hash: avoid to call kmalloc() in eBPF prog Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 08:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 5/6] bpf: hash: avoid to call kmalloc() in eBPF prog Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2015-12-16 00:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 5/6] bpf: hash: avoid to call kmalloc() in eBPF prog Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2015-12-16 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 5/6] bpf: hash: avoid to call kmalloc() in eBPF prog Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2015-12-16 01:20 +0100
[PATCH 2/6] hlist: prepare for supporting bit spinlock Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 12:30 +0100
[PATCH 1/6] bpf: hash: use atomic count Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 12:30 +0100
[PATCH 3/6] bpf: hash: move select_bucket() out of htab's spinlock Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 12:30 +0100
csiph-web