Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1289135
| From | Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: xfstests failures with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3 |
| Date | 2015-12-11 05:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qEnvb-7AG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qBmci-3CV-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBmvD-3Jz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBni3-4hS-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <qEcJs-k8-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qEi2t-3U5-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:33:33AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 09:54:58AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:39:32PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > > I've verified that this fixes all three failing xfstests reported in this mail. > > > Thanks! > > > > Hey Dave, > > > > Are you planning on pushing this fix for v4.4? > > No plans to right now - ENOSPC is a corner case that most users > won't be anywhere near, especially for experimental functionality on > hardware nobody actually has.... Really? I realize that it may be a case that most users won't actually hit, but it is a 5 line change that fixes four xfstests regressions between v4.3 and v4.4 for my DAX testing... Is there a strong reason *not* to push it in the v4.4 cycle? I'm trying to clear up all xfstests differences between DAX and non-DAX, and this would help quite a bit. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
xfstests failures with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3 Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-12-02 19:40 +0100
Re: xfstests failures with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 21:20 +0100
Re: xfstests failures with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3 Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-12-02 21:30 +0100
Re: xfstests failures with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3 Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-12-02 21:50 +0100
Re: xfstests failures with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3 Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-12-02 22:40 +0100
Re: xfstests failures with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3 Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-12-10 18:00 +0100
Re: xfstests failures with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3 Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-12-10 23:40 +0100
Re: xfstests failures with xfs, dax and v4.4-rc3 Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-12-11 05:30 +0100
csiph-web