Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #3]

From	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #3]
Date	2015-12-10 19:10 +0100
Message-ID	<qEdPd-1ez-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <qE5HY-4fH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qEbaG-7V7-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qEbkl-7Z2-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qEbu2-83j-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qEdPb-1ez-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 07:00:46PM +0100, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 10.12.2015 um 16:34 schrieb Alexander Holler:
> >Am 10.12.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> >>On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 04:15:22PM +0100, Alexander Holler wrote:
> >
> >>>Just in case of, I would suggest to quickly push out 4.3.2 (only 4.3
> >>>seems
> >>>to be affected) which contains at least the patch mentioned in the
> >>>subject
> >>>(58585c1fc301a36625db41ac7078c4dd0a218d84 in mainline).
> >>
> >>58585c1fc301a36625db41ac7078c4dd0a218d84 doesn't reference anything in
> >>Linus's tree, where did you get that git commit id?
> >
> >Uh, hmm, maybe I've picked the wrong commit number when I've used git
> >gui blame to find the original commit. Might have been one from my own
> >trees which are based on mainline. Sorry, having had a second look, the
> >one I've cherry-picked from mainline was
> >cc25b994acfbc901429da682d0f73c190e960206
> 
> To give my motivation for that mail (and that "quickly"): it's highly
> annoying to end up with a box which does not have network and, as in my
> case, even without working input devices because modules weren't loaded. And
> other people don't might be able to find the problem (and existing patch) as
> quick as I did and might end up even more annoyed than I was for a short
> period of time. ;)

We already have one other report of this problem hitting them.  I've now
released 4.3.2-rc1, with a "quick" review period of 24 hours before I
release 4.3.2 with just this fix.  If you could verify I didn't mess
anything up I would appreciate it.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #3] Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de> - 2015-12-10 10:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #3] Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de> - 2015-12-10 16:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #3] Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-12-10 16:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #3] Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de> - 2015-12-10 16:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #3] Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de> - 2015-12-10 19:10 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #3] Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-12-10 19:10 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #3] Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de> - 2015-12-10 19:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #3] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2015-12-11 12:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix the time validation [ver #3] Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> - 2015-12-11 13:40 +0100

csiph-web