Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver

From	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver
Date	2015-12-09 01:20 +0100
Message-ID	<qDAEa-UN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qDxZD-7Cj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDysI-7MA-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 08 December 2015 13:29:22 John Stultz wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-nexus7-flo.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-nexus7-flo.dts
> > index 5183d18..ee5dcb7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-nexus7-flo.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-nexus7-flo.dts
> > @@ -282,6 +282,15 @@
> >                       };
> >               };
> >
> > +             reboot_reason: reboot_reason@2a03f65c {
> > +                     compatible              = "reboot_reason";
>
> This is not a good compatible string. There should generally be a vendor
> name associated with it (use "linux," if nothing else, and you should have
> '-' instead of '_'.


Ack.


>
>
> > +                     reg                     = <0x2A03F65C 0x4>;
>
> This may easily conflict with the device it is part of. We should have
> non-overlapping register areas in general. For the example you are
> looking at, which register block is this?

So Bjorn says its IMEM, but I was assuming it was just a reserved
magic phys addr from the bootloader.

Ideally I'm hoping to use this same driver for another device, which
plans to reserve a page from memory that the bootloader won't clear.


> > +/* Types of reasons */
> > +static enum {
> > +     NONE,
> > +     BOOTLOADER,
> > +     RECOVERY,
> > +     OEM,
> > +     MAX_REASONS
> > +} __maybe_unused reason_types;
>
> The variable seems to always be unused, not just "__maybe_unused". Maybe remove it?


Yea. I initially just had the empty enum, but the compiler was giving
me "useless class storage specifier in empty declaration" warnings. So
I added a variable to it, but then I got unused variable warnings. So
I ended up with this. :P

Is there a better way? Are enums for array indexes out of fashion?
Just a list of #defines ?


> > +static int reboot_reason(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
> > +                                                             void *data)
> > +{
> > +     char *cmd = (char *)data;
> > +     long reason = reasons[NONE];
> > +
> > +     if (!reboot_reason_addr)
> > +             return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > +
> > +     if (cmd != NULL) {
> > +             if (!strncmp(cmd, "bootloader", 10))
> > +                     reason = reasons[BOOTLOADER];
> > +             else if (!strncmp(cmd, "recovery", 8))
> > +                     reason = reasons[RECOVERY];
> > +             else if (!strncmp(cmd, "oem-", 4)) {
> > +                     unsigned long code;
> > +
> > +                     if (!kstrtoul(cmd+4, 0, &code))
> > +                             reason = reasons[OEM] | (code & 0xff);
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (reason != -1)
> > +             writel(reason, reboot_reason_addr);
> > +     return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > +}
>
> Will this reboot the machine?


No. Just sets the data for the bootloader before the reboot occurs.

> > +     /* Install the notifier */
> > +     restart_nb.notifier_call = reboot_reason;
> > +     restart_nb.priority = 256;
> > +     if (register_restart_handler(&restart_nb)) {
>
> If not, you should use register_reboot_notifier() rather than
> register_restart_handler(). The former gets called to do something
> just before rebooting, while the latter attempts to actually reboot
> the machine.

Ah. Thanks.

> > +static int __init reboot_reason_init(void)
> > +{
> > +     return platform_driver_register(&reboot_reason_driver);
> > +}
> > +arch_initcall(reboot_reason_init);
>
> Why this early? If it can be a normal device_initcall, you can use
> module_platform_driver().

Yea. Mostly its just from the driver I stole the init path from, but I
thought it might be useful to have early. But I'm not passionate about
it one way or the other, so module_platform_driver is fine.


Thanks so much for the review and feedback!

thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

[RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-12-08 22:30 +0100
  Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-12-08 23:00 +0100
    Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> - 2015-12-08 23:20 +0100
      Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> - 2015-12-08 23:50 +0100
    Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-12-09 01:20 +0100
      Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> - 2015-12-09 10:00 +0100
        Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-12-09 22:50 +0100
  Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> - 2015-12-08 23:10 +0100
    Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-12-09 01:30 +0100
      Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-12-09 11:10 +0100
        Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-12-10 02:30 +0100
          Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-12-10 16:00 +0100
            Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-12-10 20:00 +0100
              Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> - 2015-12-10 21:30 +0100
                Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-12-10 22:50 +0100
                Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-12-10 23:20 +0100
    Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-12-10 02:40 +0100
      Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-12-10 10:10 +0100
        Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 10:30 +0100
          Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-12-10 20:10 +0100
            Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2015-12-10 21:00 +0100
              Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-12-10 21:10 +0100
  Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> - 2015-12-08 23:30 +0100
    Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-12-09 01:40 +0100
  Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> - 2015-12-09 10:00 +0100
  Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> - 2015-12-09 10:10 +0100

csiph-web