Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1282230

Re: [PATCH 2/2] reset: bcm63xx: Add support for the BCM63xx soft-reset controller

From Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/2] reset: bcm63xx: Add support for the BCM63xx soft-reset controller
Date 2015-12-02 19:10 +0100
Message-ID <qBk0P-2jf-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qADIf-8wf-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qADIf-8wf-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


2015-11-30 12:58 GMT-08:00 Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>:
> The BCM63xx contains a soft-reset controller activated by setting
> a bit (that must previously have cleared).
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                   |   1 +
>  drivers/reset/Kconfig         |   9 +++
>  drivers/reset/Makefile        |   1 +
>  drivers/reset/reset-bcm63xx.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 145 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/reset/reset-bcm63xx.c


Could you create a bcm directory and then add your reset-bcm63xx.c
file there? I have a pending submission for the BCM63138 reset
controller which is not at all using the same structure and will share
nothing with your driver.

[snip]

> +static int bcm63xx_reset_xlate(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> +       const struct of_phandle_args *reset_spec)
> +{
> +       struct bcm63xx_reset_priv *priv = to_bcm63xx_reset_priv(rcdev);
> +
> +       if (WARN_ON(reset_spec->args_count != rcdev->of_reset_n_cells))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       if (reset_spec->args[0] >= rcdev->nr_resets)
> +               return -EINVAL;

Should not these two things be moved to the core reset controller code
based on the #reset-cells value?

[snip]

> +       if (of_property_read_u32(np, "offset", &priv->offset))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       /* valid reset bits */
> +       if (of_property_read_u32(np, "mask", &priv->mask))
> +               priv->mask = 0xffffffff;
> +
> +       priv->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +       priv->rcdev.ops = &bcm63xx_reset_ops;
> +       priv->rcdev.nr_resets = 32;

Should not that come from Device Tree, or be computed based on the
mask property, like hweight_long() or something along these lines?

> +       priv->rcdev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +       priv->rcdev.of_reset_n_cells = 1;
> +       priv->rcdev.of_xlate = bcm63xx_reset_xlate;

-- 
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 2/2] reset: bcm63xx: Add support for the BCM63xx soft-reset  controller Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-30 22:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] reset: bcm63xx: Add support for the BCM63xx  soft-reset controller Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 19:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] reset: bcm63xx: Add support for the BCM63xx  soft-reset controller Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-02 21:50 +0100

csiph-web