Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1281958

Re: [PATCH 3/7] perf: Migrate perf to use new tick dependency mask model

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 3/7] perf: Migrate perf to use new tick dependency mask model
Date 2015-12-02 17:20 +0100
Message-ID <qBiim-161-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qunwt-7y6-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qunwu-7y6-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyotY-21n-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyHwC-6ho-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 01:34:30PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:19:33AM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:

> > It would be helpful to have a comment explaining why these two
> > can't race with each other, e.g. this race:
> > 
> > [cpu 1]  atomic_dec_and_test
> > [cpu 2] atomic_inc_return
> > [cpu 2] tick_nohz_set_dep()
> > [cpu 1] tick_nohz_clear_dep()
> > 
> > Or perhaps this is a true race condition possibility?
> > 
> > I think we're OK for the sched cases since they're protected under
> > the rq lock, I think.  I'm not sure about the POSIX cpu timers.
> 
> Hmm, how did I miss that...
> 
> So in the case of perf, either we need locking, in which case we may want
> to use something like tick_nohz_add_dep() which takes care of counting.
> But perf would be the only user.

Right; so you could use something like atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(), that
would only globally serialize the 0<->1 transitions without incurring
overhead to any other state transitions.

A possibly even less expensive option might be something along the lines
of:

tick_nohz_update_perf_dep()
{
	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
	bool freq;

	spin_lock(&lock);
	freq = !!atomic_read(&nr_freq_events);
	if (freq ^ !!tick_nohz_test_dep(PERF)) {
		if (freq)
			tick_nohz_set_dep(PERF);
		else
			tick_nohz_clear_dep(PERF);
	}
	spin_unlock(&lock);
}


	if (atomic_inc_return(&nr_freq_events) == 1)
		tick_nohz_update_perf_dep();


	if (atomic_dec_return(&nr_freq_events) == 0)
		tick_nohz_update_perf_dep();


That avoids the atomic_add_unless() muckery.

> _ sched_clock_stable: that one is more obscure. It seems that set_sched_clock_stable()
>   and clear_sched_clock_stable() can race on static keys if running concurrently, and
>   that would concern tick mask as well.

All you need to ensure here is that clear wins. Once we clear
sched_clock_stable we should _never_ set it again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 3/7] perf: Migrate perf to use new tick dependency mask  model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-02 17:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 3/7] perf: Migrate perf to use new tick dependency mask  model Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 18:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 3/7] perf: Migrate perf to use new tick dependency mask  model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-02 18:20 +0100

csiph-web