Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1283664

Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] Implement kernel live patching for ppc64le (ABIv2)

From Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] Implement kernel live patching for ppc64le (ABIv2)
Date 2015-12-04 10:10 +0100
Message-ID <qBUxl-Hj-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qyM3g-RQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyM3h-RQ-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBEVB-7vN-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 05:24:45PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/livepatch.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> [...]
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/ftrace.h>
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
> > +static inline int klp_check_compiler_support(void)
> > +{
> > +#if !defined(_CALL_ELF) || _CALL_ELF != 2
> 
> I am just curious why we do not check CC_USING_MPROFILE_KERNEL
> like in the other similar locations. It would look less cryptic.
> But I am not sure if it is precise enough.

Because a ppc with a gcc > 4.8.5 is not sufficient. The code
currently only works for the PPC ELF ABI v2, a.k.a. ppc64le.
But now that you say it, CC_USING_MPROFILE_KERNEL should go
into that condition as well. Thanks!

	Torsten

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] Implement kernel live patching for ppc64le (ABIv2) Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> - 2015-12-03 17:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] Implement kernel live patching for ppc64le  (ABIv2) Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de> - 2015-12-04 10:10 +0100

csiph-web