Re: [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq: governor: replace per-cpu delayed work with timers

From	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq: governor: replace per-cpu delayed work with timers
Date	2015-11-30 14:40 +0100
Message-ID	<qAwQr-4ef-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qoUv7-6P-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qoUv7-6P-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qAvrk-3rH-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 30-11-15, 13:05, Lucas Stach wrote:
> I don't want to block this patch on that, but maybe as a thought for
> further consideration: Wouldn't it make sense to use a single unbound
> deferrable work item for this? There was some work to make this possible
> already: "timer: make deferrable cpu unbound timers really not bound to
> a cpu"

Yes, it would be sensible but that work has gone nowhere since April.
Once that is merged, we can think about it.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq: governor: replace per-cpu delayed work  with timers Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> - 2015-11-30 13:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq: governor: replace per-cpu delayed work with  timers Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-11-30 14:40 +0100

csiph-web