Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1279515

Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state

From Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state
Date 2015-11-30 03:20 +0100
Message-ID <qAmen-5NT-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <qzayB-ZY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzdmO-2Nc-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qA6sW-4nz-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qA7p0-4Xu-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qAaGe-6R8-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, 29 Nov 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> If an ISA access takes 8 us, while the CPU runs at 1 GHz, i.e. 500M 
> loops/s, the difference will be huge.

Ondrej showed that an ISA access can take about 1.6 us. I don't know what 
to make of the "8 uS" comment in the mainline driver. Maybe it was an even 
slower ISA card.

Anyway, I made a measurement on my hardware and confirmed that lpj is a 
very bad proxy for device register access throughput. The "loops per 
access" gap is several orders of magnitude:

                                      lpj   HZ    access time (us)  lpa
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ondrej's 5380 ISA card (PC):      4797252   250   1.6               1.9k
My DMX3191D PCI card (PowerMac):   167079   100   0.42              7.0

> 
> Perhaps you can calibrate an NCR5380_read() loop at driver init time, 
> and use the calibration value later?

I had the same idea but I didn't think that the complexity was justified 
by the low precision requirement. But now that I have some timings I have 
to agree.

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> - 2015-11-18 10:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> - 2015-11-24 20:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> - 2015-11-25 04:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> - 2015-11-25 23:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> - 2015-11-26 11:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> - 2015-11-26 20:40 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> - 2015-11-26 23:40 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> - 2015-11-29 00:20 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> - 2015-11-29 01:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org> - 2015-11-29 10:20 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-11-29 10:30 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> - 2015-11-29 11:30 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-11-29 15:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH 22/71] ncr5380: Eliminate selecting state Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> - 2015-11-30 03:20 +0100

csiph-web