Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #161425

Re: OT: reply styles, family matters

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Chris Bannister wrote:

>> "Please don't respond line by line. It is patronizing and 
>> annoying."

> What did he say when you asked what he meant by this? I mean, 
> how on earth could it possibly be patronising?

I haven't asked him yet, in the interest of not muddying still 
waters. I've been thinking about his "patronizing" response and 
I believe it is an objection to the obvious clarity and 
precision that inline responses afford. Clarity and precision 
are not exactly in the ascendancy as far as cultural values are 
concerned. It is thought much more important to be "passionate" 
and "authentic," In the introductory assay of a little book of 
his from 1928, _Sceptical Essays_, Russell said

"...it is undesirable to believe a proposition for which there 
is no ground whatever for supposing it true."

Nobody anymore has the least interest in such an approach to 
life, in fact, it is deemed dangerous and probably evil in most 
of our university English departments and beyond.

However Russell's little gem of a claim describes very 
accurately what is done on email lists devoted to computing 
topics. We want to know what is the case, and why. The vast 
majority of our fellow citizens *do* find a constant focus on 
those aims quite disconcerting in any context, and, very likely, 
"patronizing." They think "How dare you subject me to 
your rules of inference and standards of factuality! What sort 
of horrible person are you?"

> I'm guessing your nephew isn't subscribed to any mailing 
> lists.

I doubt it.

> Would I be correct in that he uses Windoze and outhouse as a 
> mailer?

He uses a gmail account with "Ipad Mail".

Oh well. Thanks Chris.

-- 
Bob Bernstein

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

OT: reply styles, family matters Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2015-12-01 02:40 +0100
  Re: OT: reply styles, family matters John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-01 03:00 +0100
    Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Stuart Longland <stuartl@longlandclan.id.au> - 2015-12-02 05:30 +0100
      Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> - 2015-12-02 20:50 +0100
        Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2015-12-02 20:50 +0100
          Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> - 2015-12-03 01:40 +0100
            Re: OT: reply styles, family matters "Neal P. Murphy" <neal.p.murphy@alum.wpi.edu> - 2015-12-03 03:50 +0100
              Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2015-12-03 05:30 +0100
              Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2015-12-03 09:10 +0100
                Re: OT: reply styles, family matters <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2015-12-03 09:30 +0100
        Re: OT: reply styles, family matters John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-02 21:10 +0100
          Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 21:40 +0100
        Re: OT: reply styles, family matters <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2015-12-02 22:20 +0100
      Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-12-03 02:00 +0100
  Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Stephen Powell <zlinuxman@wowway.com> - 2015-12-01 03:20 +0100
    Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2015-12-01 04:50 +0100
  Re: OT: reply styles, family matters "Neal P. Murphy" <neal.p.murphy@alum.wpi.edu> - 2015-12-01 03:30 +0100
    Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Mike Castle <dalgoda+debian@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 04:10 +0100
    Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> - 2015-12-01 15:20 +0100
  Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2015-12-01 09:30 +0100
  Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Mart van de Wege <mvdwege@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 10:10 +0100
    Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 10:20 +0100
      Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2015-12-01 15:30 +0100
  Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> - 2015-12-01 15:30 +0100
    Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2015-12-01 17:40 +0100
      Re: OT: reply styles, family matters anxiousmac@gmail.com - 2015-12-01 18:30 +0100
        Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2015-12-01 22:00 +0100
      Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Mart van de Wege <mvdwege@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 11:30 +0100
        Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Bob Bernstein <poobah@ruptured-duck.com> - 2015-12-02 18:20 +0100
          Re: OT: reply styles, family matters Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 21:40 +0100

csiph-web