Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1280286

Re: gigaset: freeing an active object

Show all headers | View raw

On ma, 2015-11-30 at 19:30 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> I wonder how that will behave if someone attaches two of the devices to
> different serial ports. Not likely, but not forbidden either.

I see.

Perhaps I should respin and a use a pointer to a struct platform_device
in struct ser_cardstate, use the two step approach of
platform_device_alloc() and friends, etc. Only slightly more
complicated.

How would attaching two devices work with GIGASET_MINORS hardcoded to 1?
Because I haven't yet stumbled on the mechanism with which ttyGS1 (and
up) would then be created.

(I do have a second M105's in a box somewhere, so I could check myself
what happens when a second USB device is added, for what that's worth.)

Thanks,


Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

gigaset: freeing an active object Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> - 2015-11-27 16:20 +0100
  Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2015-11-27 19:00 +0100
    Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> - 2015-11-27 19:20 +0100
      Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2015-11-28 01:30 +0100
        Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> - 2015-11-28 02:30 +0100
          Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2015-11-29 15:40 +0100
        Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2015-11-28 02:30 +0100
  Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> - 2015-11-29 16:40 +0100
    Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2015-11-29 19:30 +0100
      Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> - 2015-11-29 19:40 +0100
      Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> - 2015-11-29 19:50 +0100
        Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2015-11-29 21:30 +0100
          Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2015-11-30 00:30 +0100
            Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2015-11-30 19:10 +0100
              Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> - 2015-11-30 19:40 +0100
                Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2015-11-30 22:10 +0100
                Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> - 2015-12-01 10:40 +0100
                Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2015-12-01 11:10 +0100
              Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2015-12-03 00:50 +0100
                Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2015-12-06 14:40 +0100
                Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> - 2015-12-06 16:40 +0100
                Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2015-12-06 21:20 +0100
                Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> - 2015-12-07 10:30 +0100
                Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2015-12-07 13:30 +0100
                Re: gigaset: freeing an active object Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> - 2015-12-07 19:50 +0100

csiph-web