Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #142733

Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness

From Manfred <noname@add.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness
Date 2019-04-02 14:11 +0200
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <q7vjhb$gl8$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <vriumul9to0v.fsf@gmail.com> <87ef6l72u5.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <f73c6d0a-cd2c-4053-a65d-774ceda8c0eb@googlegroups.com> <q7v697$u4p$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/2/2019 10:25 AM, David Brown wrote:
> If the union part is to be considered a
> hidden internal structure, and everything in user code should use the
> pointer type, then maybe you want:
> 
> 	typedef union object_internal * object;

I see this as probably the better alternative, under the hypothesis.
It could also be
	typedef union object_t *object;

The _t suffix is compact enough. It is also used in some standard types, 
though, and I am not sure if this is an adverse point.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness M Joshua Ryan <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2019-04-01 16:26 -0500
  Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-04-01 14:42 -0700
    Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2019-04-01 14:57 -0700
  Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-04-01 23:55 +0100
    Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2019-04-02 00:31 -0700
      Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-04-02 10:25 +0200
        Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2019-04-02 14:11 +0200
          Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-04-02 15:51 +0200
      Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-04-02 12:10 +0100
      Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2019-04-02 12:07 -0700
    Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-04-03 07:59 -0700
      Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-04-03 16:29 +0100
        Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2019-04-07 00:11 -0700
          Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2019-04-12 23:20 -0700
            Re: [PC] Simulating Monads, Lambdas, Closures, and Laziness Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-04-13 04:42 -0700

csiph-web