Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1222198
| From | Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@odin.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] check_for_tasks: read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to disable irqs |
| Date | 2015-09-10 15:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q7af1-2PS-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q79VE-2ta-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10.09.2015 16:07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> check_for_tasks() doesn't need to disable irqs, recursive read_lock()
> from interrupt is fine.
>
> While at it, s/do_each_thread/for_each_process_thread/.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@odin.com>
> ---
> kernel/cpu.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 94bbe46..24551f2 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -302,8 +302,8 @@ static inline void check_for_tasks(int dead_cpu)
> {
> struct task_struct *g, *p;
>
> - read_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> - do_each_thread(g, p) {
> + read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> if (!p->on_rq)
> continue;
> /*
> @@ -318,8 +318,8 @@ static inline void check_for_tasks(int dead_cpu)
>
> pr_warn("Task %s (pid=%d) is on cpu %d (state=%ld, flags=%x)\n",
> p->comm, task_pid_nr(p), dead_cpu, p->state, p->flags);
> - } while_each_thread(g, p);
> - read_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> + }
> + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> }
>
> struct take_cpu_down_param {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] check_for_tasks: read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to disable irqs Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-09-10 15:20 +0200 Re: [PATCH] check_for_tasks: read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to disable irqs Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@odin.com> - 2015-09-10 15:40 +0200 Re: [PATCH] check_for_tasks: read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to disable irqs Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-11 12:30 +0200 [tip:sched/core] cpu/hotplug: Read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn' t need to disable irqs tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2015-09-13 13:00 +0200
csiph-web