Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1220024
| From | Sujit K M <sjt.kar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: RT Scheduler - BUG_ON (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO) |
| Date | 2015-09-07 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q6146-1Dd-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q5XjQ-4JR-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Chinmay V S <cvs268@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > TL;DR: In Linux RT scheduler, how can rt_nr_running be non-zero AND > active-bitmap NOT have any valid bit set? > > Details: > Recently i encountered the following BUG() within the realtime > scheduler (sched_rt.c) on 3.1.10 kernel. > [101640.492840] kernel BUG at kernel/sched_rt.c:1126! > > This turns out to be > 1126 BUG_ON(idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO); The reason for the stack trace is given below. http://www.spinics.net/lists/newbies/msg08889.html -- -- Sujit K M blog(http://kmsujit.blogspot.com/) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RT Scheduler - BUG_ON (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO) Chinmay V S <cvs268@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 07:40 +0200
Re: RT Scheduler - BUG_ON (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO) Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 08:20 +0200
Re: RT Scheduler - BUG_ON (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO) Chinmay V S <cvs268@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 09:00 +0200
Re: RT Scheduler - BUG_ON (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO) Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 09:20 +0200
Re: RT Scheduler - BUG_ON (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO) Sujit K M <sjt.kar@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 11:40 +0200
Re: RT Scheduler - BUG_ON (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO) Sujit K M <sjt.kar@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 11:40 +0200
csiph-web