Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #157493

Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad situation of the repository!

From Seeker <seeker5528@comcast.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad situation of the repository!
Date 2015-09-07 01:50 +0200
Message-ID <q5RR8-5fS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <q5JJU-2iw-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5NaO-72g-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5Ogz-6P-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5OzU-IZ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5PYZ-2AP-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 9/6/2015 2:45 PM, Seeker wrote:
>
>
> On 9/6/2015 1:19 PM, Joe wrote:
>> OK, thanks. I would hope not Gimp also...
>>
> Don't know how affected testing is by which transitions, but the ones 
> the were causing
> me grief in unstable were taglib, clucene, ffmpeg-libav, and opencv.
>
> I expect flac, libmusicbrainz5, and libtorrent-rasterbar were adding 
> to the confusion as
> well.
>
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/
>
> I did uninstall ktorrent since I have not been using it anyway and I 
> was finally able to get
> everything up to date without removing anything I care about keeping.
>
> I did have to work at it to find combinations that would not cause a 
> big list of removals.
>
> I use Synaptic. First using the default upgrade to get the low hanging 
> fruit.  Then making
> selections from the things that remain. Then going through the list of 
> obsolete packages
> and selecting packages to purge. If selecting something to purge gives 
> me a list of changes
> that includes something I want to keep that has a newer version 
> available, and the list of
> those things is reasonably small, then I will give the OK for that, 
> then switch to
>  'Custome Filter --> Marked Changes' then change the selection for the 
> things I want to keep
> to upgrade in order to see what else that triggers.
>
> Later, Seeker
>
DOH!!! Spoke too soon. =-O

Synaptic decided to be weird and not show me stuff. I had just upgraded 
stuff and had not
yet closed Synaptic afterward, something that was upgraded must have 
affected the
running synaptic, which I have not had happen very often, but it's not 
the first time.

After closing and starting it again there are still some things I can't 
upgrade/remove

One KDE4 packages depends on libgpgme++2, if I were to remove the 
dependant package
that would cause other KDE4 stuff to be removed. If I upgrade it, that 
would cause gimp
to be removed.

libilmbase6 and libopenexr6 are then listed as things that have 
pre-transition type names
that would be removed with post-transition names that would be installed.

Opencv is also in the list of things it would cause to be upgraded which 
can't be upgraded
without causing something else to be removed.

For me the list *is* getting small now. :-)

Later, Seeker

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad situation of the repository! Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-09-06 17:00 +0200
  Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad situation  of the repository! The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2015-09-06 17:10 +0200
    Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad situation of the repository! Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-09-06 17:20 +0200
      Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad situation of the repository! "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2015-09-06 18:20 +0200
    Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad  situation of the repository! Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2015-09-06 20:50 +0200
      Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad situation of the repository! Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2015-09-06 21:00 +0200
      Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad  situation of the repository! Floris <jkfloris@dds.nl> - 2015-09-06 22:00 +0200
        Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad  situation of the repository! Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2015-09-06 22:20 +0200
          Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad  situation of the repository! Floris <jkfloris@dds.nl> - 2015-09-06 22:30 +0200
          Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad situation  of the repository! Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 23:30 +0200
          Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad  situation of the repository! Seeker <seeker5528@comcast.net> - 2015-09-06 23:50 +0200
            Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad  situation of the repository! Seeker <seeker5528@comcast.net> - 2015-09-07 01:50 +0200
      Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad situation  of the repository! Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 23:10 +0200
  Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad situation  of the repository! Gary Dale <garydale@torfree.net> - 2015-09-06 17:40 +0200
  Re: upgrade stable to testing or upgrading testing - very bad situation  of the repository! David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2015-09-06 18:40 +0200

csiph-web