Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1217837
| From | "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86: Wire up 32-bit direct socket calls |
| Date | 2015-09-02 22:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q4mFH-773-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pMgS6-5kz-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <q4cQ2-1iy-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 09/02/2015 02:48 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Should all other architectures follow suit? > Or should we follow the s390 approach: > It is up to the maintainer(s), largely dependent on how likely you are going to want to support this in your libc, but in general, socketcall is an abomination which there is no reason not to bypass. So follow suit unless you have a strong reason not to. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] x86: Wire up 32-bit direct socket calls Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-09-02 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86: Wire up 32-bit direct socket calls "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2015-09-02 22:20 +0200
RE: [PATCH] x86: Wire up 32-bit direct socket calls David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2015-09-03 12:10 +0200
csiph-web