Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #727858

Re: Aether, the playdough of God

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/17/2019 8:56 PM, Mahipal wrote:
> On Sunday, February 17, 2019 at 6:19:54 AM UTC-5, benj wrote:
>> On 2/16/2019 7:52 PM, Mahipal wrote:
>>> On Saturday, February 16, 2019 at 5:46:45 PM UTC-5, benj wrote:
>>>> On 2/16/2019 3:38 PM, Mahipal wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, February 16, 2019 at 7:34:33 AM UTC-5, benj wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/15/2019 7:49 PM, john wrote:
>>>>>>> Banjo
>>>>>>> “ As aether is not a fluid, it cannot be bottled and sold for
>>>>>>> whatever reasons. No one has found a way to carve out aether into
>>>>>>> anything solid, excepts plants and mothers (in my humble and
>>>>>>> hopefully in due course uncontroversial opinion). “
>>>>>>> Aether does not move as the matter moves.
>>>>>>> It is like the pixels on your TV screen.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nothing ‘makes waves’ in it. There is Space at the next level down
>>>>>>> made from smaller versions of your Matter and the waves are in and
>>>>>>> of THAT level matter.
>>>>>
>>>>> How many levels are there? From ground level to... is there even a ground level?
>>>>>
>>>>>>> And the Aether is also how that matter expresses itself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wait a darn second. Aether has a body language, with bits of sign language?
>>>>>
>>>>>>> When the ball gets kicked on your TV screen, the pixels don’t go
>>>>>>> by it creating a ‘wind’. The ball simply ‘IS’ those pixels when
>>>>>>> the ball is there, and ‘ISN’T’ again when it it passes.
>>>>>>> Therefore, Aether has and can never have a ‘wind’.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Everything Banjo has said is totally wrong as usual.
>>>>>
>>>>> Everything? When it comes to mathematics, he=BanjoJi sounds like you==BenjJi.
>>>>
>>>> I of course meant "everything he said in his post" He might actually be
>>>> right about some things like say the quality of Bollywood songs and
>>>> Lyrics (though that is not my opinion). Methinks Banjoji sounding like
>>>> meji is some kind of insult!
>>>
>>> I like that, meji! Now I'm wishing I'd written meji Meji MEJI... SelfieMeJi.
>>> Btw, I'm the one who posts Indian lyrics to this English newsgroup. I do try,
>>> I suppose, I attempt to fish for persons who may also know them songs/lyrics.
>>> In music, there's a certain connection amongst those who grew up, with the
>>> same tunes in mind. Like... I have me my books and poetry to protect me...
>>
>> Most books (fiction) and poetry are fantasy (lies). Not much protectoin
>> there!

> Simon&Garfunkel(1966)... I have my books and poetry to protect me... I am a rock...
> 
> There's non-fiction books, as you well know. You're reading the wrong poetry.

Non-fiction poetry? Hmmmm. Not familiar with that Simon and Garfunkle tune.

>>> I also know many here, simply based on what they write. And vice versa...
>>
>> Well, THAT is a bad assumption in this troll pit!
> 
> I know from trolls and real people discussions. At least, I hope I know.
> 
>>> Per dictionary sample: science must be at the service of man, and not vice versa.
>>
>> That is up until the present when Science is in the service of politics.
> 
> What do you call thousands of politicians drowned at sea? A good start?!
> Here's a random, out of thin air question. Describe what happens to a dead
> whale's carcas as it sinks to the bottom of the sea/ocean?

I thought they washed up o beaches?

>>>>>> He denies all physics data. He denies, relativity, he denies Michelson
>>>>>> Morley, he denies that matter is aether and he denies light exists. He's
>>>>>> a real Indian science genius.
>>>>>
>>>>> Indian science? No such thing, BenjJi. Besides, BanjoJi is now of Australia.
>>>>> Now that I put the pieces together, a Foster-bitch is a beer drinking chic.
>>>>
>>>> Not "Indian Science" Looperji (is that like Jewish Physics? I'll have to
>>>> think about that one), but science Indian! Get it? As for Foster's, it's
>>>> said to be a cheap-ass ale, but very drinkable. What does that mean? You
>>>> ever see any beer that wasn't very drinkable? Sure he lives now in Oz
>>>> and has to put up with Foster's, but does that take the Indian out of
>>>> him? I don't think so. It's just like my efforts to turn you into a real
>>>> Merkin. So long as you are still GaGa over Bollywood trash I've failed
>>>> miserably.
>>>
>>> I ain't nationalistic about me my science. I'm no mere Merkin, should
>>> they even let me cross their orangish wall. I've never voluntarily
>>> listened to any Lady Gaga song. Bollywood trash, I'll presume that
>>> refers to movies, are something I no longer watch. Quality of contents
>>> was better, in both movies and music, when I was younger. Hollywood too.
>>
>> No longer watch movies? Wow! Is that progress or WHAT? I"m not sure
>> quality has ever been better. A few try hard but the rest just coast.
>> Movies are all about reflecting styles of the present and trying to use
>> fantasy to influence the future.
> 
> No not really, I'll watch old movies once in a while. Either Hindi or English.
> I'm trying to go watch the new movie about the late musician Freddie
> Mercury and the band Queen in Bohemian Rhapsody. Freddie was half-Indian
> and half-English. Queen's music, just timeless. Brian May is an Astrophysicist.

Yeah, it was at the local Dollar theater (re) but I just never got 
around to going to see it even though I wanted too. I figure, hey still 
online for download. Even though some theater(re) experiences require 
the big screen and speakers, indeed some even DEMAND the IMAX experience 
some even DEMAND that IMAX 3D experience, Indeed SOME enve demand the 
IMAX 3D experience in "the" optimum seat in the theater(re).

>>> Fun fact. I discovered a, new to me, old song the other day playing on a
>>> radio show with a very limited range, less than about pi miles from home.
>>> Song's here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKoeHJ0Wqr0 Released: 1975-01-12
>>> I stumbled on to it just 2019-02-12. Been repeatedly listening to it since.
>>> Regret? Some. I bloody hell could've known this song since I was fourteen!
>>
>> Nice photo, but song? Not so much. I guess there has been progress but
>> you are not free of your demons yet!
> 
> Photos, pictures, semi-nude dancers do not make a song. Never have,
> not from my perspective. Indians had music videos long before there
> was MTV. I'll put with some photos-set-to-music, but music must stand
> independent of any imagery placed upon or around it. It's just me.
> 
> Do my demons have names or descriptions? I'm curious to find out.

Demons with no name! Sounds like a song.

> Here's a great video/music combination in English song by The Verve:
> https://tinyurl.com/Verve7638 more than 420+ million views, it has.

450 mil Teens in the world? And now I've added to that number myself. 
Brrr. I find myself misrepresented!

>>> Time==Waqt जो भी तस्वीर बनाता हूँ... something about painting pictures... happens.
>>>
>>>>> He's, being ahem... a person and all, would be a real science Indian genius.
>>>>>
>>>>> All said and done, everyone here is hoping to be doing/talking real science.
>>>>>
>>>>> To Astrology, Palmistry, Kamasutra(y), add Numerology. Not just for India.
>>>>
>>>> Um...Please explain Kamasutra(y) more?  :-)
>>>
>>> It's an attempt to make rhyme, sounding like Kamasutreee... words are all I have...
>>>
>>> Some complain: All you've got is word salad.
>>> Some complain: All you've got is mathematics.
>>> Some want: Models described in and by pictures.
>>> Some want: Models described in and by equations.
>>
>> Music is mathematics Looprji. Think about that one.
> 
> I wouldn't be thinking about that for the first time either. Music is
> simultaneously very physical. I do try play bamboo flutes. Since that
> makes loud sounds whilst I practice, disturbing hundreds of people that
> per chance might surround me, I rarely practice any more. You're welcome!

Playing Bamboo flute only counts if you'd carved it your self from a 
piece of bamboo you pulled from the ground, Grasshopper. And it helps if 
you speak softly and bear the scars of the temple on hyour forearms.

> The only string instrument I'm good at playing is a tennis racquet.

Sadly that is the ONE instrument I do not play well at all. It was 
always too hard on my elvow joints.

>>> Summize Summe(y)es... how to unite them all and in the darkness bind them?
>>>
>>> -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
> -- Mahipal == माहिपाल "My Pal" or "Maple" Loops, S(y)rup, Wood. IPMM ७६३८!
> 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Aether, the playdough of God Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 17:39 -0800
  Re: Aether, the playdough of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-14 13:48 +1100
    Re: Aether, the playdough of God Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 21:06 -0800
      Re: Aether, the playdough of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-14 16:31 +1100
        Re: Aether, the playdough of God Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 21:53 -0800
          Re: Aether, the playdough of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-14 17:25 +1100
            Re: Aether, the playdough of God Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 23:47 -0800
              Re: Aether, the playdough of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-14 19:56 +1100
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 23:28 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 16:49 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 17:43 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 07:34 -0500
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 12:38 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 17:46 -0500
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 16:52 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 06:19 -0500
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 17:56 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Buck Futter <DognPolisher@hotmail.com> - 2019-02-17 19:38 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 07:43 -0500
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 15:39 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 20:07 -0500
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Buck Futter <DognPolisher@hotmail.com> - 2019-02-16 16:44 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 01:55 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 17:40 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 23:25 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 15:32 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-17 19:32 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 09:47 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-18 13:25 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-16 10:13 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 15:37 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-17 06:51 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-16 19:42 +1100
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 07:42 -0500
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 01:55 -0800
                Re: Aether, the playdough of God Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 01:48 -0800
    Re: Aether, the playdough of God benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 02:49 -0500
      Re: Aether, the playdough of God Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 23:59 -0800
      Re: Aether, the playdough of God Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-14 19:53 +1100
        Re: Aether, the playdough of God benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-14 16:22 -0500
          Re: Aether, the playdough of God Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-14 18:07 -0600
            Re: Aether, the playdough of God mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-14 19:59 -0800
            Re: Aether, the playdough of God Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 15:10 -0800
          Re: Aether, the playdough of God Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 17:36 -0800
      Re: Aether, the playdough of God Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-15 17:30 -0800
  Re: Aether, the playdough of God mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 20:02 -0800
  Re: Aether, the playdough of God kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2019-02-16 09:47 -0800
    Re: Aether, the playdough of God Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2019-02-16 15:34 -0800
  Re: Aether, the playdough of God "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-16 14:11 -0800
    Re: Aether, the playdough of God "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-16 14:13 -0800

csiph-web