Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg)

From	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg)
Date	2015-09-01 23:50 +0200
Message-ID	<q41Bf-21v-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <q3Z6p-72W-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q3Zzs-7B3-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <q3ZSO-7XX-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <q40ca-7Z-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <q41hU-1F0-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Confining things through xattr labels on inodes.  ;)  FWIW, despite
> warnings to the contrary, the test system I have does boot just fine
> with SELinux in Enforcing mode.  It is likely the least scientific and
> useful scenario though, as it is just a dumb headless NUC box that all
> I do is test kernels on.  I won't even pretend that my mention here is
> anything more than an anecdote along the lines of "cool story, bro."

It's too bad that there isn't a well-supported way to lock down /proc
other than setting up inode labels and adding MAC policy.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg) David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 12:00 +0200
  Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg) Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-08-31 17:40 +0200
    Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg) David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 18:30 +0200
      Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg) Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-08-31 21:20 +0200
        Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg) Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> - 2015-09-01 19:20 +0200
          Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg) Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-09-01 20:40 +0200
            Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg) Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> - 2015-09-01 21:10 +0200
              Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg) Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-09-01 21:40 +0200
                Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg) Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> - 2015-09-01 22:00 +0200
                Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg) Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-09-01 22:20 +0200
                Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg) Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> - 2015-09-01 23:30 +0200
                Re: kdbus_proc_permission (Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus updates for Greg) Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-09-01 23:50 +0200

csiph-web