Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #487178

Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10.

From	Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.checkmate
Subject	Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10.
Date	2019-02-11 15:53 -0600
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<q3sqs7$lpb$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <almarsoft.476793191463996275@news.albasani.net> <ffe36526-245d-498e-bd46-cb0f4b9e46bb@googlegroups.com> <almarsoft.611436825807894035@news.albasani.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.11--4.46am.Seattle.2019> <q3snuf$6tg$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/11/2019 3:03 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 2/11/2019 4:46 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> Branimir wrote:
>>> Windows is highly insecure...
>>
>> You are insecure about Windows.
>>
>> In all my years of using Windows, since 1989 ( and DOS, since 1983 ),
>> I've yet to experience a malware problem of any kind, shape or form.
>> To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10.
>>
> 
> The best virus is one that you do not know you have.

I got a bad one on XP, it replaced one of the first files windows starts
up (forgot the name)- all external IO goes through it, so it shut the
computer off from internet, all the ports,

I emailed Kaspersky and they helped me out sent me a killfile for that,
which was a race condition between the killfile and boot up, so it took
about 20 times before it stopped the file from running, then I renamed
it, (xx) I found a good copy of the file (on the same machine in Windows
cab files) and replace the bad one.  It turnes out that that file had
about 2k of unused space at the end, so the bad guys put their code
there but have the CRC check calculate the same, so it is almost
undetectable.

the code can intercept all internal/external traffic, credit card #s
etc.   Roumered that NSA does this too.

It took a week.

(we have about 10 computers around here, xp, win7,win10, raspberypi,
linux mint, Centos 6 on HP server, ubuntou on a small server(no fans)
Mac, even wait for it......   C/PM ! in the garage on a shelf that OS
fits in 150k on a 8" floppy disk, called the Ferguison or Big Board.

Thread

Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-02-06 22:16 +0000
  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2019-02-06 15:03 -0800
  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-08 07:40 -0600
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-08 14:49 +0000
      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 10:28 -0500
        Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-08 17:56 +0000
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 13:19 -0500
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 13:32 -0500
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-08 12:35 -0600
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:23 +0000
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-08 13:00 -0600
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-09 03:21 +0000
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:55 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:29 +0000
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:54 -0500
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:34 +0000
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2019-02-09 20:23 -0800
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-10 19:34 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:06 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-03-14 04:39 +0000
                When I see "malware", the phrase "clueless idiot" pops into my head. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-03-13 21:49 -0700
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? tom <tom@0.0.0.0> - 2019-02-09 20:22 -0800
              Please kill yourself on the way out of the door Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:46 -0800
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 15:02 -0500
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2019-02-10 21:32 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 21:48 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-10 23:04 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 23:15 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-10 23:23 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 23:37 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-10 23:39 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 23:50 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 00:29 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:01 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 10:24 +0100
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 03:44 -0800
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 13:26 +0100
                To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-11 04:46 -0800
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-11 10:41 -0500
                Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 09:57 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 10:29 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 10:38 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 11:08 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2019-02-11 13:22 -0500
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 12:56 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 16:44 +0000
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 09:11 -0800
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 12:59 -0600
                Re: ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-11 12:10 -0700
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 13:20 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 12:22 -0700
                Re: Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 14:51 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 13:55 -0700
                Re: Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-11 14:59 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:35 -0600
                Re: Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-12 10:56 -0600
                Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-12 11:12 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 09:41 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 13:47 -0500
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 13:04 -0800
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:39 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 17:56 +0000
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 13:03 -0800
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:53 -0600
                To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-11 13:57 -0800
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 15:03 -0700
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 22:03 +0000
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 17:07 -0600
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-11 15:38 -0800
                Re: To run the best software, on the best hardware, you need Windows 10. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-12 17:14 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 06:10 -0800
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2019-02-11 16:38 +0100
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 10:39 -0800
                *You* can't, I can. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-02-11 14:00 -0800
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 13:50 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-10 19:36 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:12 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-03-14 19:05 -0400
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 07:11 -0600
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 06:35 -0800
        Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-08 18:53 +0000
          Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-08 14:26 -0500
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-08 19:59 +0000
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-09 03:26 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 19:00 -0500
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:59 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-09 19:58 -0800
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 07:17 -0600
                Signatures are for posts with ZERO informational content Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 05:27 -0800
                Re: Signatures are for posts with ZERO informational content chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 07:33 -0600
                A person could actually grow old waiting to be enlighten on COLA about Linux. Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 05:36 -0800
                Re: A person could actually grow old waiting to be enlighten on COLA about Linux. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-11 13:52 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2019-02-11 06:12 -0800
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-11 08:33 -0600
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 12:23 -0500
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-09 21:54 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2019-02-10 14:16 +0000
                Russell's shitty attitude is the PROBLEM, rather than the solution Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 06:29 -0800
            Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:36 +0000
              Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-09 22:03 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 14:52 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 13:14 -0500
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 18:18 +0000
                Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2019-02-23 14:59 +0000
  There is stupid, then there is vallor stupid Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-09 05:25 -0800
  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-09 18:48 -0500
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:40 +0000
      Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2019-02-10 19:31 -0500
        Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? Ratchetjaw <ratchetjaw@mail.com> - 2019-02-11 01:05 +0000
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-09 21:47 -0500
    The Linux Advocates on COLA are total ass-holes Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-10 02:51 -0800
      Re: The Linux Advocates on COLA are total ass-holes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-10 08:13 -0500
        Time to drop a MOAB on COLA Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2019-02-11 04:52 -0800
        Re: The Linux Advocates on COLA are total ass-holes Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2019-02-16 02:41 +0000
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-11 14:47 -0500
  Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-11 14:49 -0500
    Re: Desktop vs. Server -- are we, indeed, moribund? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-02-12 09:26 +0000

csiph-web