Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #157163

Re: the IBM keyboard

From rlharris@oplink.net
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: the IBM keyboard
Date 2015-08-31 05:40 +0200
Message-ID <q3o6S-47f-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <q3lC1-np-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q3m53-1a6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <q3naN-2LJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, August 30, 2015 9:29 pm, David Wright wrote:
> ...
> but can hardly be considered adequate for a power-user of a
> textual application where individual commands that have been used hundreds
> of times will be typed without any conscious effort at all, rather like a
> pianist plays ornaments.

In that epoch of my career I was running Window$ (95 or 98 or whatever) --
rodent and all -- on a second machine, for typesetting with Aldus (now
Adobe) PageMaker.  The work of composition, however, was done exclusively
on a DO$ machine running Word 5.0.

This all was in the day before the advent of low-cost Ethernet with
multi-conductor cables terminated in RJ-45 connectors; back then,
networking generally was done with coaxial cable.  But nonetheless, I had
a network connecting the two machines -- "sneaker net".

So when an error by me or a blunder by PageMaker was discovered in the
typeset output, I would go back to the "master" document in Word 5.0, make
a change, and then copy the revised document file to floppy.  (I think
that, by that time, 3.5 inch floppies had become common, if not the
standard.)  Next, I would "network" the floppy to the drive of the Window$
machine, load the file into PageMaker, and typeset the document again.



So even still today I am amazed by the ability in Debian to make a
mouseless edit with EMacs, then, with a keystroke or two, switch to the
terminal and typeset with a single command, and finally, with another
keystroke, switch to the xdvi window and see the change -- all in a matter
of seconds.

Having learned PageMaker on the Macintosh and subsequently having migrated
to PageMaker on the IBM-PC, I can say from experience that (at least, back
then) PageMaker could not hold a candle to LaTeX.  LaTeX was far more
simple to use, and LaTeX produced far better quality of typesetting.

So in the end, that Y2K bug in M$ Word 5.0 turned out to be a great
blessing, and nothing less than Providential.

RLH

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

the IBM keyboard rlharris@oplink.net - 2015-08-31 03:00 +0200
  Re: the IBM keyboard Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2015-08-31 03:20 +0200
    Re: the IBM keyboard rlharris@oplink.net - 2015-08-31 03:40 +0200
      Re: the IBM keyboard Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> - 2015-08-31 06:20 +0200
        Re: the IBM keyboard Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> - 2015-08-31 06:50 +0200
      Re: the IBM keyboard Stuart Longland <stuartl@longlandclan.yi.org> - 2015-09-03 23:30 +0200
    Re: the IBM keyboard Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2015-08-31 17:00 +0200
  Re: the IBM keyboard Carl Fink <carl@finknetwork.com> - 2015-08-31 03:30 +0200
    Re: the IBM keyboard David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2015-08-31 04:40 +0200
      Re: the IBM keyboard rlharris@oplink.net - 2015-08-31 05:40 +0200
      Re: the IBM keyboard David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2015-08-31 06:20 +0200
      Re: the IBM keyboard Stuart Longland <stuartl@longlandclan.yi.org> - 2015-09-03 23:30 +0200

csiph-web