Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #53546
| From | "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: The Danger of Systemd |
| Date | 2019-02-04 15:20 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <q39l7k02gfa@news3.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <q39hss06nv@news2.newsguy.com> <87a7jb4mqf.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> |
On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 15:06:16 +0000, Richard Kettlewell vomited this verbiage that I considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible reasons: > > but the historical situation is the opposite of acceptance > without question: Debian alone had a >7000-message discussion about it. > They have to do more -- a LOT more -- than just talk. The developers at Gentoo, for example, have created eudev as a response to the systemd appropriation of udev. This represents a significant step towards rejecting the hegemony of systemd. Fortunately, I still utilize static device nodes and require neither udev nor eudev, but I recognize the extreme importance of having this alternative. However, with systemd looming, I always wonder just how much longer I will be able to choose static device nodes.
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 14:23 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-04 15:06 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 15:20 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-02-04 19:27 +0100
Re: The Danger of Systemd flyer <snowflyer09o@gmail.com> - 2019-02-04 15:12 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 15:34 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-02-04 09:53 -0600
Re: The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 16:07 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2019-02-04 19:05 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-02-04 19:14 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2019-02-05 14:00 +0200
Re: The Danger of Systemd Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-02-05 15:13 -0600
Re: The Danger of Systemd Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-02-05 16:32 -0500
Re: The Danger of Systemd Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2019-02-06 09:35 +0200
Re: The Danger of Systemd Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2019-02-05 21:35 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-04 17:04 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2019-02-04 19:11 +0000
Re: The Danger of Systemd DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2019-02-04 12:15 -0500
Re: The Danger of Systemd "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-02-04 19:22 +0100
Re: The Danger of Systemd Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2019-02-06 22:08 +0100
Re: The Danger of Systemd "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-07 17:00 +0100
csiph-web