Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1215242

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/11] ipv6: Only create RTF_CACHE route after encountering pmtu exception

From Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/11] ipv6: Only create RTF_CACHE route after encountering pmtu exception
Date 2015-08-28 11:40 +0200
Message-ID <q2oiB-7Kl-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <pXEo1-3iX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pXEo1-3iX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pYpdf-3yi-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <q2mqv-51a-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <q2o8W-7z5-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Am 28.08.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Alexander Holler:
> Am 28.08.2015 um 09:36 schrieb Martin KaFai Lau:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:43:20AM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
>>> That's why I vote to check out if it's possible/reasonable to
>>> backport this
>>> series to the stable kernels.
>> I have backported to 4.0.y without major issue, so possible.
>
> Sure, as this was likely one of the versions they've used to create the
> patch.
>
>> I did try on 3.1x and gave up.
>>
>> It is a lot of changes,  so I don't think it is a good idea for -stable.
>
> Depends on what you're expecting from a (stable) kernel.
>
> The patch description mentions what happens when a system deals with a
> lot of other ipv6-systems and that problem is easy to exercise and to
> value.
>
> Rating the information leak is harder, some people even won't understand
> that this might be a problem.
>
> And now look at which kernel-versions are now used in new devices
> (likely something <= 3.10, which is more than two years old), how long
> they will be used, and make a guess about IPv6 usage in 5 years.
>
> Anyway, I've no insights about all the politics happening in the
> background (e.g. stuff like the LTSI tree) and I've just wanted raise
> awareness about that (imho important) patch series.

Not to speak about phones, but those are most likely a problem of one 
specific company  ;)

Regards,

Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/11] ipv6: Only create RTF_CACHE route  after encountering pmtu exception Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> - 2015-08-28 09:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/11] ipv6: Only create RTF_CACHE route after  encountering pmtu exception Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de> - 2015-08-28 11:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/11] ipv6: Only create RTF_CACHE route after  encountering pmtu exception Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de> - 2015-08-28 11:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/11] ipv6: Only create RTF_CACHE route  after encountering pmtu exception David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-08-28 20:30 +0200

csiph-web