Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #156929
| From | Rainer Stumbaum <rainer.stumbaum@boerse-go.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Wheezy "NFSv4 callback reply buffer overflowed" |
| Date | 2015-08-28 04:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q2h7s-5DA-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q2h7s-5DA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q29MC-3F0-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Javier, nfs.v4.read_delegation on (value might be overwritten in takeover) nfs.v4.write_delegation off (value might be overwritten in takeover) Did you try disabling nfs.v4.read_delegation? No, since we only recently changed from NFSv3 to NFSv4 and with v3 were using mount option nocto on 99% of the mounts for performance. We have currently no idea what implications we would have if we turn off read delegation. Is there any way to estimate/measure the performance improvements achieved by using read delegation as in our current setup? >From looking through the source the message seems to be just a warning, right? Thanks Rainer
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Wheezy "NFSv4 callback reply buffer overflowed" Rainer Stumbaum <rainer.stumbaum@boerse-go.de> - 2015-08-27 18:50 +0200
Re: Wheezy "NFSv4 callback reply buffer overflowed" Javier Barroso <javibarroso@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:10 +0200
Re: Wheezy "NFSv4 callback reply buffer overflowed" Rainer Stumbaum <rainer.stumbaum@boerse-go.de> - 2015-08-28 04:00 +0200
Re: Wheezy "NFSv4 callback reply buffer overflowed" Javier Barroso <javibarroso@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 13:40 +0200
AW: Wheezy "NFSv4 callback reply buffer overflowed" Rainer Stumbaum <rainer.stumbaum@boerse-go.de> - 2015-08-31 11:30 +0200
csiph-web