Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #722042
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world |
| Date | 2019-01-02 13:46 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <q0ifbf$1a5h$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <101842ec-c97b-4aee-8f7b-2baa44fc2ccd@googlegroups.com> <q0d4he$9qn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <01510966-c14a-48a6-b87f-9a004ce32d81@googlegroups.com> <q0g4ud$19ma$1@gioia.aioe.org> <27636642-e235-41aa-8980-cc97c4f2c49f@googlegroups.com> |
<alal65536@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 10:06:33 PM UTC+5:30, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <alal65536@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 6:41:15 PM UTC+5:30, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <alal65536@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, December 30, 2018 at 5:16:15 PM UTC+5:30, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> <alal65536@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 9:57:20 PM UTC+5:30, James McGinn wrote: >>>>>>>> Because in this world, scientific theories are empirically verified, and >>>>>>>> apply throughout the earth and more. While religious beliefs are a >>>>>>>> product of their time and place, and are not verified with rigour. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not all scientific beliefs have been verified. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> String theory has not been empirically verified. Is it science, when it >>>>>>> hasn’t been empirically verified? >>>>>> >>>>>> No. It has to be testable. >>>>>> >>>>>> Look up when the neutrino was hypothesized and when it was verified. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Aren’t scientific theories required to be able to make testable predictions? >>>>>> >>>>>> String theory does. >>>>> >>>>> What testable predictions has string theory made? >>>> >>>> Lots! There are tests designed for curled up dimensions, leakage of gravity >>>> between branes, and several others. Try googling. >>> >>> I don’t need to. To the best of my knowledge, string theory is not >>> testable within our current abilities. >> >> That is incorrect. That is precisely why I suggested googling. >> >> Don’t go by what you THINK you know. > > I know that string theory has not been verified. That’s true but I already gave you several examples of theories that went unverified for decades. > > I have already read that it is not verifiable. And that’s wrong. > > Abhinav Lal > Writer & Investor > > “Truth is under attack” > >> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> How do you test science about the fate of the universe? >>>> >>>> That’s not the part you test. You test the other parts of the theory and >>>> assume that the other implications of the theory will then pan out. >>> >>> So, do we have any clarity on the fate of the universe? >> >> Some, yes. Even without string theory. That of course will never be put to >> direct test. >> >>> >>> Abhinav Lal >>> Writer & Investor >>> >>> “The great unknown” >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Abhinav Lal >>>>> Writer & Investor >>>>> >>>>> “Imagination is more important than knowledge” >>>>> — Albert Einstein >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Abhinav Lal >>>>>>> Writer & Investor >>>>>>> >>>>>>> “Science, ain’t a perfect science” >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 03:16 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2018-12-29 13:24 +0100
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 05:39 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2018-12-29 15:11 +0100
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 08:19 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2018-12-29 17:29 +0100
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-29 15:48 -0600
Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 08:27 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 00:08 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 11:46 +0000
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 05:49 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 13:11 +0000
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world alal65536@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 03:21 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 16:36 +0000
Shut up and calculate. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-01 15:01 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world alal65536@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 18:50 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 20:50 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2019-01-02 11:55 +0100
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 13:46 +0000
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 06:17 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world alal65536@gmail.com - 2019-01-02 06:44 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 15:10 +0000
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 07:19 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 15:57 +0000
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 08:42 -0800
Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world pnalsing@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 08:54 -0800
Re: Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2019-01-02 05:11 -0800
Why is there consistency of scientific beliefs, but inconsistency of religious beliefs in this world Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-12-31 16:42 -0800
csiph-web