Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #502825

Re: particle nature of spacetime?

From benj <none@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: particle nature of spacetime?
References (2 earlier) <hlwdjsd2-EB1149.19451525062015@news.giganews.com> <8if9ol.4b2.19.1@news.alt.net> <mmjk66$13d$1@speranza.aioe.org> <a26f88e7-402f-4de8-bfe5-66c78f87357f@googlegroups.com> <mmjq9b$fp5$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Message-ID <pykjx.25541$DJ3.10580@fx05.iad> (permalink)
Organization TeraNews.com
Date 2015-06-26 18:41 -0400

Show all headers | View raw


On 06/26/2015 11:14 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 6/26/2015 9:48 AM, john wrote:
>> Odd, surprisingly, had a glimmering!!:
>> "The trick is to find concepts which DO match things in nature, because
>> those are useful physical concepts. "Nothing" doesn't seem to be one of
>> those useful concepts."
>>
>> I so agree!!
>> Odd, what's happening to you?
>>
>> Other useless concepts:
>> Beginning of Everything (Big Bang)
>
> Ah, but this DOES seem to match reality. There is a significant amount
> of evidence that supports this. Recession of the distant galaxies being
> one. Cosmic ray background radiation being another.
>
> Remember that an idea is not crazy if the evidence supports it.
>
>> Ending of Everything
>
> This isn't something that I think is a popular concept in physics.
>
>> Something with no volume ( No two
>> things, etc...)
>
> Again, this seems to match reality. There are objects that show no
> indications of size. Saying "But they just HAVE to" when the evidence
> says otherwise is just imposing wishes.
>
>> Limits to the smallness or largeness of
>> organizations of energy (atoms, emr).
>
> This isn't something that I think is a popular concept in physics.
>
>> Virtual ANYTHING (real is real)
>
> Virtual particles don't mean unreal particles. They are very real.
> They're not imaginary at all. I don't think you should let words trick
> you so easily.
>
>>
>> I could go on, but it would just be a
>> continual dis on Standard Model

You could go on but you'd only prove yourself a total moron!
Virtual particles aren't real. They are PURE mathematical fantasy. Your 
undying belief in them is noted. I'll tell Harlow so you two can get 
together and share ghost stories. Boinker, I've never seen someone quite 
as gullible to bullshit as you are!


-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

particle nature of spacetime? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-06-25 18:14 -0400
  Re: particle nature of spacetime? Ralph <mmman_90@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-25 19:15 -0400
  Re: particle nature of spacetime? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-25 18:18 -0700
    Re: particle nature of spacetime? Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-06-26 10:20 -0700
      Re: particle nature of spacetime? Ralph <mmman_90@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-27 19:40 -0400
  Re: particle nature of spacetime? "Col. Edmund J. Burke" <namcolonel@bigboobs.net> - 2015-06-25 18:31 -0700
    Re: particle nature of spacetime? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-25 19:45 -0700
      Re: particle nature of spacetime? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-06-26 00:25 -0400
        Re: particle nature of spacetime? Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 00:34 -0400
        Re: particle nature of spacetime? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-25 22:23 -0700
          Re: particle nature of spacetime? Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-06-26 10:20 -0700
        Re: particle nature of spacetime? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 18:41 -0400
        Re: particle nature of spacetime? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 18:51 -0400
          Re: particle nature of spacetime? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 15:57 -0700
        Re: particle nature of spacetime? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-06-27 16:16 -0400
        Re: particle nature of spacetime? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-06-27 17:33 -0700
  Re: particle nature of spacetime? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-06-26 01:53 -0400
  Re: particle nature of spacetime? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 11:27 -0400
    Re: particle nature of spacetime? Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-06-26 12:56 -0500
      Re: particle nature of spacetime? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 15:00 -0400
        Re: particle nature of spacetime? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 20:05 -0400
          Re: particle nature of spacetime? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 17:19 -0700
  Re: particle nature of spacetime? Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-06-26 10:25 -0700
  minkosKi's ****-up noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-06-28 15:12 -0700
  Re: particle nature of spacetime? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-07-02 11:38 -0400
  uh noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 16:27 -0700
  Re: particle nature of spacetime? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 18:29 -0500

csiph-web