Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #502825
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: particle nature of spacetime? |
| References | (2 earlier) <hlwdjsd2-EB1149.19451525062015@news.giganews.com> <8if9ol.4b2.19.1@news.alt.net> <mmjk66$13d$1@speranza.aioe.org> <a26f88e7-402f-4de8-bfe5-66c78f87357f@googlegroups.com> <mmjq9b$fp5$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| Message-ID | <pykjx.25541$DJ3.10580@fx05.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | TeraNews.com |
| Date | 2015-06-26 18:41 -0400 |
On 06/26/2015 11:14 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 6/26/2015 9:48 AM, john wrote:
>> Odd, surprisingly, had a glimmering!!:
>> "The trick is to find concepts which DO match things in nature, because
>> those are useful physical concepts. "Nothing" doesn't seem to be one of
>> those useful concepts."
>>
>> I so agree!!
>> Odd, what's happening to you?
>>
>> Other useless concepts:
>> Beginning of Everything (Big Bang)
>
> Ah, but this DOES seem to match reality. There is a significant amount
> of evidence that supports this. Recession of the distant galaxies being
> one. Cosmic ray background radiation being another.
>
> Remember that an idea is not crazy if the evidence supports it.
>
>> Ending of Everything
>
> This isn't something that I think is a popular concept in physics.
>
>> Something with no volume ( No two
>> things, etc...)
>
> Again, this seems to match reality. There are objects that show no
> indications of size. Saying "But they just HAVE to" when the evidence
> says otherwise is just imposing wishes.
>
>> Limits to the smallness or largeness of
>> organizations of energy (atoms, emr).
>
> This isn't something that I think is a popular concept in physics.
>
>> Virtual ANYTHING (real is real)
>
> Virtual particles don't mean unreal particles. They are very real.
> They're not imaginary at all. I don't think you should let words trick
> you so easily.
>
>>
>> I could go on, but it would just be a
>> continual dis on Standard Model
You could go on but you'd only prove yourself a total moron!
Virtual particles aren't real. They are PURE mathematical fantasy. Your
undying belief in them is noted. I'll tell Harlow so you two can get
together and share ghost stories. Boinker, I've never seen someone quite
as gullible to bullshit as you are!
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
particle nature of spacetime? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-06-25 18:14 -0400
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Ralph <mmman_90@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-25 19:15 -0400
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-25 18:18 -0700
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-06-26 10:20 -0700
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Ralph <mmman_90@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-27 19:40 -0400
Re: particle nature of spacetime? "Col. Edmund J. Burke" <namcolonel@bigboobs.net> - 2015-06-25 18:31 -0700
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-25 19:45 -0700
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-06-26 00:25 -0400
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 00:34 -0400
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-06-25 22:23 -0700
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-06-26 10:20 -0700
Re: particle nature of spacetime? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 18:41 -0400
Re: particle nature of spacetime? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 18:51 -0400
Re: particle nature of spacetime? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 15:57 -0700
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-06-27 16:16 -0400
Re: particle nature of spacetime? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-06-27 17:33 -0700
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-06-26 01:53 -0400
Re: particle nature of spacetime? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 11:27 -0400
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2015-06-26 12:56 -0500
Re: particle nature of spacetime? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 15:00 -0400
Re: particle nature of spacetime? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 20:05 -0400
Re: particle nature of spacetime? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-06-26 17:19 -0700
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-06-26 10:25 -0700
minkosKi's ****-up noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-06-28 15:12 -0700
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-07-02 11:38 -0400
uh noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 16:27 -0700
Re: particle nature of spacetime? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-02 18:29 -0500
csiph-web