Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #720645

Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood

Show all headers | View raw

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 10:56:09 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> 
>>> You incompetent dolts can't even put forth a rational question.
>>> 
>>> Laws don't make predictions, dumbass. People make predictions.  However,
>>> if I was to make a prediction based on Dalton's law here I would say that
>>> it makes no prediction at all.  It doesn't say something will happen. 
>>> And it doesn't say nothing will happen.  
>>> 
>>> As everybody knows, evaporation will happen. But this has nothing
>>> whatsoever to do with Dalton's law.  Dalton's law deal with different
>>> percentages of GASES!!!
>>> 
>>> Evaporation (you fucking imbecile) produces vapor not gas!!!
>>> 
>>> It is not called Dalton's gas and vapor law.  It's called Dalton's gas law. 
>> 
>> Yes, exactly. And what’s interesting is that you can apply Dalton’s law to
>> a system that involves only water as the fluid,
> 
> Like you have a clue, idiot.
> 
>> whether you regard that
>> fluid as a gas, a fog, an emulsion, or whatever you’d like to guess. 
> 
> LOL. Yeah, facts don't matter for science groupies.  
> 
>> But
>> since Dalton’s law is a law for gases, and it accurately predicts the
>> relationship between the measured water fluid, then this fluid is
>> successfully treated as a gas. 
> 
> Meaningless.

Gee, seems straightforward to me. Dalton’s law works for water. Dalton’s
law is a gas law. Therefore water behaves like a gas. 

What part of this do you find difficult?

> 
>> Or are you claiming that Dalton’s law won’t work for water?
> 
> Uh, er, uh  . . . uh?
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 10:24 -0800
  Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-22 18:44 +0000
    Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:10 -0800
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 18:56 +0000
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 11:06 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 19:30 +0000
    Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-23 03:11 +0000
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 19:14 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-22 20:00 -0800
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 10:50 -0800
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-22 21:32 -0600
      Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 12:10 -0800
        Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-25 17:22 +0000
          Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 10:16 -0800

csiph-web