Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #720318
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood |
| Date | 2018-12-22 21:32 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pvmvlj$1nqd$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <da098e18-5f26-407e-8ed9-ba8b73a9708a@googlegroups.com> <pvm0ln$5va$1@pcls7.std.com> <pvmud6$bln$3@pcls7.std.com> |
On 12/22/2018 9:11 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> James McGinn writes:
>> moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:
>
>>>> Dalton's is well understood.
>
>>> Apparently not by yourself. Otherwise you could have answered my simple
>>> question easily.
>
>>> You have dry (no H2O of any form) air at 20 C. You introduce some liquid
>>> water, also at 20 C, into it. According to Dalton's Law, what happens?
>
>>> I will interpret any personal attack as an admission that you cannot solve
>>> this problem.
>
>> You incompetent dolts can't even put forth a rational question.
>> *Laws don't make predictions*, dumbass. ...
>
> <snip more rants and insults>
>
> Thanks for making my point. You really just don't understand Dalton's Law
> at all. So why did you claim it is well understood? Or well understood by
> everyone except yourself?
>
from above
"Laws don't make predictions" - James McGinn
ANOTHER KEEPER !!!
Corollary: Predictions never use Laws. -James McGinn
"Church Lady" McGinn spewing his BS, no laws needed, nor understood.
[ Cold Steam Tables !!! ]
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 10:24 -0800
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-22 18:44 +0000
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:10 -0800
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 18:56 +0000
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 11:06 -0800
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 19:30 +0000
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-23 03:11 +0000
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 19:14 -0800
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-22 20:00 -0800
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 10:50 -0800
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-22 21:32 -0600
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 12:10 -0800
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-25 17:22 +0000
Re: Dalton's Law is Well Understood James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 10:16 -0800
csiph-web