Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.privacy.anon-server > #67003

Re: Linux 4.20 is Running Slower Than 4.19 On Intel CPUs

From Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com>
Newsgroups alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.os.linux, comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.vms
Subject Re: Linux 4.20 is Running Slower Than 4.19 On Intel CPUs
Date 2018-11-26 20:40 -0800
Organization no organization
Message-ID <ptihrm$jc9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <psntul$etc$1@news.mixmin.net> <539a942d864477d67c6a482bd91fdb98@remailer.privacy.at> <psv1j9$3ej$2@news.albasani.net> <psvhsf$nu7$1@dont-email.me> <psviq3$cst$1@panix2.panix.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/19/18 4:00 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> Dave Froble  <davef@tsoft-inc.com> wrote:
>> On 11/19/2018 2:06 PM, Jens Stuckelberger wrote:
>>> On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 06:23:08 +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
>>>
>>>> And to think Intel was responsible for killing Alpha, then helping foist
>>>> that piece of shit IA64 on us.
>>>
>>> 	You might like to learn that IA64 is immune to all these attacks
>>> that are plaguing the x86 architecture.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, too bad it's not immune to sinking ....
> 
> It's got cache prefetch, it isn't immune to timing exploits at all.  Now, it
> might be -difficult- to manage timing exploits because of the VLIW
> architecture and the difficulty of knowing which operational part of the
> instruction you're waiting for.  But on the other hand, the icache on the
> IA64 is constantly being blown out so your opportunities are good.
> --scott
> 

``And in large part the fixes have been made.
<https://www.tomshardware.com/news/stibp-fixes-restore-linux-performance,38148.html>

	bliss

-- 
bliss dash SF 4 ever at dslextreme dot com

Back to alt.privacy.anon-server | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Linux 4.20 is Running Slower Than 4.19 On Intel CPUs Nomen Nescio <noreply@mixnym.net> - 2018-11-16 20:21 -0600
  Re: Linux 4.20 is Running Slower Than 4.19 On Intel CPUs "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2018-11-17 11:10 +0100
    Re: Linux 4.20 is Running Slower Than 4.19 On Intel CPUs "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-11-17 11:26 +0100
    Re: Linux 4.20 is Running Slower Than 4.19 On Intel CPUs "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2018-11-18 06:23 +0100
      Re: Linux 4.20 is Running Slower Than 4.19 On Intel CPUs Jens Stuckelberger <Jens_Stuckelberger@nowhere.net> - 2018-11-19 19:06 +0000
        Re: Linux 4.20 is Running Slower Than 4.19 On Intel CPUs Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2018-11-19 21:44 +0100
          Re: Linux 4.20 is Running Slower Than 4.19 On Intel CPUs Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-11-20 10:19 +0100
        Re: Linux 4.20 is Running Slower Than 4.19 On Intel CPUs Dave Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2018-11-19 18:44 -0500
          Re: Linux 4.20 is Running Slower Than 4.19 On Intel CPUs kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2018-11-19 19:00 -0500
            Re: Linux 4.20 is Running Slower Than 4.19 On Intel CPUs Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2018-11-26 20:40 -0800
        Re: Linux 4.20 is Running Slower Than 4.19 On Intel CPUs Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2018-11-20 10:09 +0100

csiph-web