Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #714857

Re: Apollo 11 was Fake

Show all headers | View raw

benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/26/2018 11:08 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> pnal
>>> “I'm pretty sure that fusion power plants are still a long way off...
>>> ”
>>> Like...never
>>> 
>> 
>> You know, for a guy who puts a lot of stock in alien power sources and cold
>> fusion household generators promised by hucksters, you sure are dour about
>> something that actually stands a chance of working someday.
>> 
>> So how is it that you insist that promising ideas are hopeless but
>> way-far-out-there ideas seem very likely to you? Is it just love of the
>> underdogs and outcasts?
>> 
> Odd for a guy so absolutely determined to insure that stays completely 
> ignorant of anything New even to the point of refusing to read papers 
> and books if they have not been officially approved and endorsed by the 
> power-establishment of science, you really have no room to criticize 
> someone who actually has an open mind which is one of the "norms" of 
> science which you would know IF you hadn't refused to even glance at my 
> pook on the subject so you could maintain your current level of stupidity.

I already told you. I have your book. I’ve looked at it. How many times are
you going to insist that I refuse to look at it?

As for “open mind”, if you two want to entertain yourselves by following
every fringe AND VERY LIKELY BAD idea, at the expense of learning anything
that shows promise and where lots of people are working on it, then by all
means you can be the fringe fanboys. Most people try to optimize their
time, doing things that are likely to pan out. Some people like you two,
though, love hunting for buried UFOs in cornfields with metal detectors
precisely because no one else is doing it and you’d get famous if you found
one; and it doesn’t matter at all to you that this is very likely a huge
waste of time. After all, it’s your time to waste. What’s funny is your
ranting that everyone should waste their time in the same way because you
do. 

> 
> You are still a fool.
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 15:00 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 15:07 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 15:25 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 15:35 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 15:40 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-26 00:27 +0000
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-26 00:45 +0000
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-26 00:57 +0000
      Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 18:02 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Steve <invalidz@example.net> - 2018-11-25 16:51 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 17:14 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-26 02:01 +0000
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 18:24 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 18:47 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 18:42 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 18:48 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 18:52 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 19:26 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-25 22:40 -0500
      Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-25 19:51 -0800
        Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-26 09:20 -0500
        Re: Apollo 11 was Fake john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 07:43 -0800
          Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 16:08 +0000
            Re: Apollo 11 was Fake benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 12:57 -0500
              Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 19:27 +0000
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-26 13:43 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-26 13:48 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 22:57 +0000
      Re: Apollo 11 was Fake Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 15:36 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 13:21 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 13:26 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-11-29 00:45 +0000
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 13:27 -0800
    Re: Apollo 11 was Fake pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 13:34 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 15:04 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-11-28 15:11 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-29 09:50 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-29 14:38 -0800
  Re: Apollo 11 was Fake numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-11-29 15:20 -0800

csiph-web