Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #710686
| From | Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Analysis of climate models |
| Date | 2018-11-01 06:32 +0100 |
| Organization | news.eternal-september.org |
| Message-ID | <pre350$jd1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <c94395fc-09b1-445a-b53c-1f3ad6412a74@googlegroups.com> <prdahg$1iab$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> Wrote in message: > On 10/31/2018 1:22 PM, Edward Prochak wrote: >> In response to sergio's comments and my own goal of trying to >> talk about physics in this group, I am starting this thread. >> >> So the goal is to investigate the limits of climate models. >> >> This link has some references maybe for a start >> https://globalchange.mit.edu/publications/peer-reviewed >> >> I'll have to read them from teh library (I do not have >> subscription or school access to any journals.) >> >> Or if you find peer reviewed articles that can be shared >> please post a link in this thread. >> >> Please NO news sources, we are looking for scientific >> publications. >> >> Lets see who is serious about this. >> Ed > > Sure Ed, how about this one: > > http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf > > Lessee. This shows CO2 is a MINOR greenhouse gas with other gasses being > of even less effect. Estimate is that CO2 is really only 15-20% of the > greenhouse effect. Water vapor/clouds are major contributor. Please not > that the Human generated CO2 is a minor portion of that already minor > fraction something like 4% of the 15%. This makes the "anthropogenic" > part of global warming something with some serious proof of the theory > needed. > 20 % is still major component. 1% would be minor. This 20% makes about 6 deg C From the total cca 30 deg C of GH effect. The 0.01 % increase if CO2 makes about 1.5 Deg C difference of global average temperature difference. 0.01% CO2 is equivalent of cca 20 tons of carbon per a person, cca 130 kg per person And year during 150 years. Let consider lower AVG people count during the era, so let say 365 kg per person and year, 1 kg per person and day. Just by breathing, people population contribution is comparable to total CO2 increase, not counting burning fossil fuels and forests, which is much more. -- Libor Striz aka Poutnik ( a pilgrim/wanderer/wayfarer) "Humour is the only effective weapon against stupidity." Miloš Forman ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 10:22 -0700
UsedCar salesman cite facts. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-31 12:37 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-31 14:49 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 13:00 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 18:32 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-01 06:32 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 02:06 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-01 07:33 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 10:08 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-01 15:33 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 13:22 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-14 00:28 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 16:47 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-01 10:16 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 13:16 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 16:02 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-02 20:19 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 12:56 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:39 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 12:59 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 14:45 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 13:07 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 12:34 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 13:09 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 09:50 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 19:17 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 07:16 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-01 21:23 +0000
Re: Analysis of climate models Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-11-02 05:21 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:04 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-02 08:31 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Dan Riley <dan131riley@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:15 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 12:40 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 13:13 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-18 17:22 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 17:48 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-19 05:05 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-18 22:46 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-19 06:59 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 07:42 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:58 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 19:17 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 12:22 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-20 21:02 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 11:01 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 12:58 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:10 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 12:04 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-20 22:02 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-19 07:00 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:00 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-20 21:28 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 10:38 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-25 00:53 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:21 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Dan Riley <dan131riley@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:08 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:23 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 13:00 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 13:04 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 14:51 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 13:59 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-19 07:27 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:06 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 11:59 -0500
csiph-web