Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #710568
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Analysis of climate models |
| Date | 2018-10-31 14:49 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <prd100$10so$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <c94395fc-09b1-445a-b53c-1f3ad6412a74@googlegroups.com> |
On 10/31/2018 12:22 PM, Edward Prochak wrote: > In response to sergio's comments and my own goal of trying to > talk about physics in this group, I am starting this thread. > > So the goal is to investigate the limits of climate models. > > This link has some references maybe for a start > https://globalchange.mit.edu/publications/peer-reviewed > > I'll have to read them from teh library (I do not have > subscription or school access to any journals.) > > Or if you find peer reviewed articles that can be shared > please post a link in this thread. > > Please NO news sources, we are looking for scientific > publications. > > Lets see who is serious about this. > Ed > [as an example of uphill climb this is, I googled "error analysis of climate models" and got this link is from Stanford University, the Hoover Institution, but is not a peer reviewed, article, but written by two professors (2017) It shows concern for assumptions and processing areas, and models; https://www.hoover.org/research/flawed-climate-models ] this following paper is interesting, I think they are compairing a much finer grain spacial model which shows more terrain influence, than ANUSPLIN. the first few paragraphs are great. AND the result is the two models are within 3% to 8% (or disagree by) and the RMS error is 0.3 C over 30 year span(?) one of their measurments is 10cm Soil Temperature (air is too varable, soil is a longer term average, 10cm down may be a 6 mo(?) average ) And the front end says theyused data from 1971 to 2000 from ANUSPLIN V4.3 is that another climate model? I notice they are generating SNR not sure what that means. https://www.niwa.co.nz/sites/niwa.co.nz/files/import/attachments/Climate_Maps_Error_Analysis.pdf
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 10:22 -0700
UsedCar salesman cite facts. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-31 12:37 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-31 14:49 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 13:00 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 18:32 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-01 06:32 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 02:06 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-01 07:33 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 10:08 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-01 15:33 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 13:22 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-14 00:28 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 16:47 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-01 10:16 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 13:16 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 16:02 -0700
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-02 20:19 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 12:56 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:39 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 12:59 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 14:45 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 13:07 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 12:34 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 13:09 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 09:50 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 19:17 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 07:16 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-01 21:23 +0000
Re: Analysis of climate models Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-11-02 05:21 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:04 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-02 08:31 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Dan Riley <dan131riley@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:15 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 12:40 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 13:13 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-18 17:22 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 17:48 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-19 05:05 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-18 22:46 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-11-19 06:59 +0100
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 07:42 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:58 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 19:17 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 12:22 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-20 21:02 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 11:01 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 12:58 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:10 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 12:04 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-20 22:02 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-19 07:00 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:00 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-20 21:28 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 10:38 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-25 00:53 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:21 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Dan Riley <dan131riley@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:08 -0400
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:23 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 13:00 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 13:04 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 14:51 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 13:59 -0600
Re: Analysis of climate models Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-11-19 07:27 -0500
Re: Analysis of climate models Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 08:06 -0800
Re: Analysis of climate models benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 11:59 -0500
csiph-web