Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #703444

Re: Going Up!

From benj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Going Up!
Date 2018-09-18 21:06 -0400
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <pns7eh$jp8$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (14 earlier) <d8257cc7-cb6d-4537-9acc-07726a8e7fbd@googlegroups.com> <pnrhh6$1jb0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <c00a1096-b7e8-4fc4-84d3-0f4ad2317f7d@googlegroups.com> <a2cd7602-71ef-4e6c-bb0f-f0b5e8f95ea1@googlegroups.com> <pns322$erb$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/18/2018 7:51 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 9/18/2018 3:29 PM, Edward Prochak wrote:
>> On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 at 2:55:31 PM UTC-4, john wrote:
>>> Odd
>>> “You say the space elevator is impossible. Why?“
>>>
>>> Why don’t you suggest some logical reasons?
>>
>> I think the idea from a space elevator goes back to the 1950s?
>> Let me look.
>> Wow was I wrong:
>> "The concept of a tower reaching geosynchronous orbit was first
>>   published in 1895 by Konstantin Tsiolkovsky.[3] His proposal
>>   was for a free-standing tower reaching from the surface of
>>   Earth to the height of geostationary orbit."
>>
>> The basic idea id over 100 years old!
>>
>>
>> A tower does not work as well as a tether design. With the center
>> of mass slightly above geosynchronous orbit, a cable reaching down
>> to earth's surface provides everything that is needed.
>>
>> No danger of collapse.
>> deployment is achievable, especially with today's rockets.
>>
>> Only the cable is the tough part. material having consistent
>> Tensile strength for a length over 35,000 km (21,000 miles)
>> is a challenge.
>>
>> So what do you do with it?
>>   solar power conversion and transmission to earth (requires
>>                high power transmission lines that long also).
>>   zero gravity manufacturing
>>   Human space travel research (Think ISS but higher)
>>   astronomy observatory
>>   tourism/entertainment/advertisement
>>
>> It would have to be based at an equatorial country, one of
>> 13 countries: Ecuador, Colombia, Brazil, Sao Tome & Principe,
>> Gabon, Republic of the Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo,
>> Uganda, Kenya, Somalia, Maldives, Indonesia and Kiribati.
>>
>> Really, at this point it is only an engineering problem
>> of building the cables and getting them in place.
>>
>> Enjoy,
>> ed
>>
> 
> open questions;
> 
> if not a tower, what is holding the cable up ?
> is it a counterweight above geosync ?
> would one still have to fix cable to the ground ?
> how to keep the counterweight in position ?
> is the cable cutting lines of magnetic field?
> 
Rumor has it that an experiment was tried with such a cable in space not 
as an elevator but as a massive current generator to power some kind of 
SDI device. Reportedly the cable broke and the experiment failed. Who 
knows if they tried it again. Maybe Sergio knows. He seems tuned into 
such things.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Going Up! The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-09-04 10:27 -0700
  Re: Going Up! Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 13:14 -0700
    Re: Going Up! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-04 19:09 -0500
      Re: Going Up! Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 06:26 -0700
        Re: Going Up! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 07:25 -0700
          Re: Going Up! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-14 09:38 -0500
            Re: Going Up! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 07:43 -0700
            Re: Going Up! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 11:26 -0400
          Re: Going Up! Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 10:01 -0700
            Re: Going Up! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:10 -0700
              Re: Going Up! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 21:24 +0000
                Re: Going Up! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-17 14:34 -0700
                Re: Going Up! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 16:12 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 23:22 +0000
                Re: Going Up! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 06:29 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 14:30 +0000
                Re: Going Up! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 08:13 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 16:22 +0000
                Re: Going Up! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 10:28 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 18:52 +0000
                Re: Going Up! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 11:55 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 20:04 +0000
                Re: Going Up! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:11 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:27 +0000
                Re: Going Up! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 14:30 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 00:02 +0000
                Re: Going Up! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 17:20 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 00:42 +0000
                Re: Going Up! Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:29 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-18 18:51 -0500
                Re: Going Up! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:06 -0400
                Re: Going Up! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-18 21:26 -0500
                Re: Going Up! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-18 19:38 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-18 21:48 -0500
                Re: Going Up! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-18 19:51 -0700
                Re: Going Up! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 07:01 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 13:31 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 13:29 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 21:00 -0500
                Re: Going Up! Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 13:14 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 21:08 -0500
                Re: Going Up! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 06:34 -0700
                Re: Going Up! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 14:30 +0000
      Re: Going Up! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-19 22:37 -0700
        Re: Going Up! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 10:09 -0500
  Re: Going Up! Haných Ltskáš <lnni@yawlucla.ha> - 2018-09-04 23:08 +0000

csiph-web