Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #471960
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The false premises of current theories |
| Date | 2018-09-15 19:08 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pnjlbb$111n$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <de2ce6b9-8d71-4c54-9de7-94bbb6467463@googlegroups.com> <pnelqd$11if$1@gioia.aioe.org> <6681974f-ed3e-4f45-9bbc-28bc393f3c0b@googlegroups.com> <pnj72j$77d$1@gioia.aioe.org> <161b6ebe-e7c3-410c-97c4-4831b9cb9f70@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Saturday, September 15, 2018 at 11:04:54 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> On Thursday, September 13, 2018 at 5:45:53 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, September 13, 2018 at 7:39:21 AM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: >>>>>> On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 1:05:07 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 6:53:31 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 10:51:44 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> The false premises of the current theories that led generations of >>>>>>>>>>>> physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase. Specifically, these false >>>>>>>>>>>> premises failed to lead physicists to come up with a unified >>>>>>>>>>>> theory for all the forces >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A summary of the false premises of current theories: >>>>>>>>>>>> In quantum mechanics, specifically the QFT, a material object will >>>>>>>>>>>> project a field throughout space >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That is incorrect. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You are a woodworker....You are not qualified. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And you are a chemical engineer. You are no more qualified than me. >>>>>>>>> Therefore you are unqualified. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Except that I don’t make unsupported statements. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of course you do. You always refer to your own theory. Referring to your >>>>>>> own theory is not a supporting statement of your theory. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is nothing wrong with referring to my theory (the Model Mechanics) >>>>>> when it is the only theory that can unify all the forces of nature >>>>>> (including gravity). >>>>> >>>>> It doesn't "unify" anything, it just talks about it. I can also talk about >>>>> many things, like "I am the queen of England". >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jan >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think that in Ken’s mind, just writing about physics, trained or >>>> untrained in the subject, qualifies one to be a physicist. >>> >>> You seem to think that being a physicist is a big deal....it is not. >> >> It is in physics. Specialized fields require specialized training. Being a >> trained engineer is a big deal in engineering, too > > It is not. Yes it is. You cannot be an engineer without a certification, and you can’t get certification without specialized training. > Specialized training means training inside the box. Training inside the box is essential for thinking outside the box constructively. > ....that’s why the trained physicists failed to come up with a viable > unified theory for all the forces for the last 100 years. I, on the other > hand, think outside the box....I invented the Pyramid Technique for doing > physics and I was able to come to come up with Model Mechanics in a short time. > >> >>> Besides physicists don’t have a monopoly to come up with new ideas on >>> physics. My Model Mechanics is a prime example. >> >> People uneducated in physics have never once produced a valuable idea in >> physics. > > Wrong Faraday was not a physicist and he produced some valuable ideas. Faraday was THOROUGHLY trained in physics. He studied under Humphry Davy, and he read everything he could get his hands on, and he attended scientific lectures several times a week. You are deluded if you think people have made an impact in physics without physics training. >> >>> >>>> >>>> So my game plan would be to write a 2-page theory of everything in even >>>> simpler everyday language than Ken’s. I will also include a real >>>> calculation with a number for the gravitational constant as the result. I >>>> will then publish it on the internet. I will then have published a theory >>>> that is superior to Ken’s theory, because it is simpler, more accessible to >>>> the lay public, and has at least one calculation in it. This will make me >>>> more qualified than Ken as a physicist. Then I will be in a position to >>>> judge his work. >>> >>> I encourage you to do it. Look forward to your result. >>> >> >> Lol. >> >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-10 06:57 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-10 07:41 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 17:14 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 14:51 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-10 15:24 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 22:53 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-11 09:33 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 17:05 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 05:09 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 13:08 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 07:54 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 15:31 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 13:40 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 01:16 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:26 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 11:36 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 12:27 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 12:47 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:26 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-15 14:39 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 11:14 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 02:16 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-16 10:18 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:11 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-18 22:00 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-19 08:45 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-19 09:23 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 12:19 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaws.np> - 2018-09-20 15:26 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-21 06:13 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 07:34 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 21:45 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:35 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 15:04 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-15 08:24 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-12 21:26 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-14 19:02 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:41 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:39 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 11:38 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 12:29 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 21:45 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:33 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 15:04 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 11:30 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 19:08 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-19 08:42 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 17:12 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-21 06:33 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 15:00 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-11 17:30 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-11 19:07 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 19:21 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-11 09:31 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-11 13:08 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-11 20:15 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-11 16:41 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-12 16:30 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-10 17:25 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-10 10:33 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 19:23 +0000
Re: The false premises of current theories mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 13:07 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 16:21 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:30 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 18:06 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-09-13 04:39 +0200
Re: The false premises of current theories consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 21:16 -0700
Re: The false premises of current theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-09-13 10:48 +0200
csiph-web