Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #467104

If Global Warming Is Real, Why All The Lies?

From William Poaster <noemail@lutenorg.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject If Global Warming Is Real, Why All The Lies?
Date 2018-09-14 00:12 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <pneude$pkr$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


https://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/if-global-warming-is-real-
why-do-government-scientists-have-to-keep-cheating/

Snit, the unemployed Prescott Arizona leech in:
5...4..3...2..1
 

"A few decades back, an upstanding member of the global warming alarmist 
community said that if the public was going to take the threat of man-
caused climate change seriously, the alarmists were going to have to 
exaggerate the evidence.

It was in 1989 that Stephen Schneider wrote in Discover magazine that in 
order "to capture the public's imagination . . . we have to offer up 
scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little 
mention of any doubts we might have."

Let's not forget that the late climatologist was first a believer in 
global cooling in the 1970s. He was worried that a new ice age was coming.

Of course the alarmist community has followed Schneider's script. It's 
spent much of the last three decades trying to spook the public into a 
panic.

One example of this agenda to drive fright into our brains was the 
ClimateGate scandal at Britain's University of East Anglia. A series of 
email threads between climate scientists showed that they were torturing 
the temperature data to produce evidence of warming that wasn't occurring.

Who can forget their conspiracy to "hide the decline"?

Don't think this is an isolated incident. News out of the United Kingdom 
over the weekend tells us that "world leaders were duped into investing 
billions over manipulated global warming data."

"A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America's 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own 
rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but 
flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world 
leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the United Nations 
climate conference in Paris in 2015," the Daily Mail reports.

"The report claimed that the 'pause' or 'slowdown' in global warming in 
the period since 1998 — revealed by U.N. scientists in 2013 — never 
existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than 
scientists expected."

The Daily Mail identifies the whistleblower as "John Bates, a top NOAA 
scientist with an impeccable reputation." His strong objections to the 
publication "of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in 
what he describes as a 'blatant attempt to intensify the impact.' "

Bates blames Thomas Karl, the paper's lead author, whom he said insisted 
"on decisions and scientific choices that maximized warming and minimized 
documentation . . . in an effort to discredit the notion of a global 
warming pause."

Please don't be surprised. Government-paid researchers are desperate to 
perpetuate the climate shock. They know that if there is no warming as 
they have predicted, the generous public funds that support their work 
will eventually dry up.

It is in their financial interest to keep the public tied up in knots of 
anxiety and to dupe politicians, who are eager to assume the posture of 
caring guardians of the environment so they'll to continue to hand them 
money

And it fits right in with the other evidence problems that undermine the 
global warming narrative, such as the hopelessly flawed temperature 
record, the unreliable models that can't even predict the past, and the 
possibility that as many half of the alarmist research papers could be 
wrong.

Instapundit Glenn Reynolds is fond of saying that he'll believe there's a 
warming crisis when the people who are saying it's a crisis start acting 
like it is. Maybe we'll start believing there's a warming problem when 
government scientists quit cheating to make it look like a problem exists.

"

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

If Global Warming Is Real, Why All The Lies? William Poaster <noemail@lutenorg.com> - 2018-09-14 00:12 +0000
  Re: If Global Warming Is Real, Why All The Lies? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-14 12:27 +0000
    Re: If Global Warming Is Real, Why All The Lies? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-14 14:50 -0400
      Re: If Global Warming Is Real, Why All The Lies? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-15 15:43 +0000
        Re: If Global Warming Is Real, Why All The Lies? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-15 09:14 -0700
          Re: If Global Warming Is Real, Why All The Lies? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 13:22 -0700
      Re: If Global Warming Is Real, Why All The Lies? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2018-09-15 16:28 +0000
        Re: If Global Warming Is Real, Why All The Lies? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-15 16:43 +0000
    Re: If Global Warming Is Real, Why All The Lies? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 18:53 -0700
  Re: If Global Warming Is Real, Why All The Lies? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-14 07:18 -0700

csiph-web