Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #471340

Re: The false premises of current theories

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: The false premises of current theories
Date 2018-09-10 22:53 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <pn6sl8$5h0$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <ed6c132c-31c3-44c2-ae9f-4835a5c14db3@googlegroups.com> <pn60dt$ivd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0e5a0218-26ae-4159-a959-38a03bcbb239@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 10:51:44 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>> The false premises of the current theories that led generations of
>>> physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase. Specifically, these false
>>> premises failed to lead physicists to come up with a unified theory for all the forces
>>> 
>>> A summary of the false premises of current theories:
>>> In quantum mechanics, specifically the QFT, a material object will
>>> project a field throughout space 
>> 
>> That is incorrect. 
> 
> You are a woodworker....You are not qualified.

And you are a chemical engineer. You are no more qualified than me.
Therefore you are unqualified. 

> 
>> 
>>> and virtual particles in the form of bosons will pop in and out of this
>>> field. These bosons will act as force messengers to affect an appropriate
>>> force to the interacting object. The force messengers for all the forces
>>> can be summarized as follows:
>>> The strong force messengers are the gluons. The existence of gluon has
>>> not been found experimentally.
>> 
>> That is incorrect. 
>> 
>>> 
>>> The force messengers for the electroweak force are: W+, W- and Z0. These
>>> force messengers have been found experimentally.
>>> 
>>> The force messengers for the electromagnetic force are the photons. The
>>> virtual photons have been found experimentally.
>>> 
>>> The force messengers for gravity are the gravitons. Graviton has not been
>>> found experimentally. In fact, the notion of gravitons for the force of
>>> gravity has been a total failure mathematically. This means that there is
>>> no valid theory of quantum gravity.
>>> 
>>> Einstein’s premise of gravity is simply that the interacting objects
>>> follow the curvature of space-time. There is no physical cause of gravity
>>> in Einstein’s description. 
>> 
>> That is incorrect. 
>> 
>>> In other words, GRT is merely a mathematical description of the paths
>>> followed by the interacting objects.
>> 
>> That is incorrect. 
>> 
>>> 
>>> I came to the conclusion that there is one physical model of our universe
>>> that can replace these divergent false premises of GRT and QFT. The
>>> result of an intense search for such physical model for the past twenty
>>> years is: Model Mechanics. Model Mechanics posits that all the particles,
>>> all the forces and all the processes of nature are the result of
>>> different absolute motions of the fundamental S-Particles in a structured
>>> and elastic ether called the E-Matrix. The detailed description of Model
>>> Mechanics is available in Chapter 3 of my book in the following link: 
>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2016ibook.pdf
>>> 
>>> The main feature of Model Mechanics are as follows:
>>> It offers a realistic origin of the universe. 
>>> It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. 
>>> It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes.
>>> It provides a mechanism to amalgamate all the forces of nature. 
>>> It can be validated experimentally. 
>>> It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). 
>>> It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG)
>>> It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity as subsets.
>>> It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics.
>>> It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force.
>>> It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle.
>>> It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum experiments. 
>>> It explains the structures of atoms. 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-10 06:57 -0700
  Re: The false premises of current theories Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-10 07:41 -0700
    Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 17:14 +0000
  Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 14:51 +0000
    Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-10 15:24 -0700
      Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 22:53 +0000
        Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-11 09:33 -0700
          Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 17:05 +0000
            Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 05:09 -0700
              Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 13:08 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 07:54 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 15:31 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-12 13:40 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 01:16 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:26 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 11:36 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 12:27 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 12:47 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:26 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-15 14:39 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 11:14 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 02:16 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-16 10:18 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:11 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-18 22:00 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-19 08:45 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-19 09:23 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 12:19 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaws.np> - 2018-09-20 15:26 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-21 06:13 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 07:34 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 21:45 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:35 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 15:04 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-15 08:24 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-12 21:26 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-14 19:02 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:41 -0700
            Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:39 -0700
              Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 11:38 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 12:29 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 21:45 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 07:33 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 15:04 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-15 11:30 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 19:08 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-19 08:42 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 17:12 +0000
                Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-21 06:33 -0700
                Re: The false premises of current theories Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 15:00 +0000
          Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-11 17:30 +0000
            Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-11 19:07 +0000
      Re: The false premises of current theories rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 19:21 -0700
        Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-11 09:31 -0700
        Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-11 13:08 -0700
          Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-11 20:15 +0000
            Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-11 16:41 -0700
              Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-12 16:30 +0000
  Re: The false premises of current theories moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-10 17:25 +0000
  Re: The false premises of current theories "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-10 10:33 -0700
  Re: The false premises of current theories Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 19:23 +0000
  Re: The false premises of current theories mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 13:07 -0700
  Re: The false premises of current theories JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 16:21 -0700
    Re: The false premises of current theories kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-13 07:30 -0700
  Re: The false premises of current theories numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 18:06 -0700
    Re: The false premises of current theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-09-13 04:39 +0200
      Re: The false premises of current theories consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 21:16 -0700
        Re: The false premises of current theories Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-09-13 10:48 +0200

csiph-web