Re: Climate change is not a matter for debate. We must not offer credibility to those who deny it

From	kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
Subject	Re: Climate change is not a matter for debate. We must not offer credibility to those who deny it
Date	2018-09-01 11:52 -0400
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<pmeckq$b91$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<pmdv2s$1lac$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pmeaf9$847$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 9/1/2018 11:15 AM, benj wrote:
> On 9/1/2018 8:01 AM, kensi wrote:
>> If 'balance' means giving voice to those who deny the reality of 
>> human-triggered climate change, we will not take part in the debate:
>>
>> https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/aug/26/climate-change-is-real-we-must-not-offer-credibility-to-those-who-deny-it 
>
> Guardian, self-debunking propaganda rag calling for total censorship of 
> any facts contrary to their post-modernist Neo-Marxist babbling drool.
> 
> Leave it to the "socialists" to keep calling for censorship, violence, 
> hate-speech, discrimination and racism.
> 
> "Kensi" you are scum. That is fact, not hate-speech.

Nicely frothed, but you forgot to address the actual argument made in 
the article.

And you made a new k'lame of a factual, falsifiable character, that the 
Guardian is Marxist. Please to be pointing us to an article published in 
the Guardian that clearly advocates for public ownership of all means of 
production, or else retract that k'lame. A URL to such a Guardian 
article will do.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

Thread

csiph-web