Re: What are the common well-verified psychological traits of the Apple Apologists on this newsgroup?

From	Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.system
Subject	Re: What are the common well-verified psychological traits of the Apple Apologists on this newsgroup?
Date	2018-08-27 11:43 -0700
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<pm1gno$1qmc$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <153b083d-b5ee-4305-a0a3-0146928e38ce@googlegroups.com> <pm1fev$1oig$1@gioia.aioe.org> <35a93049-c580-47a2-9b0f-dfb803f81883@googlegroups.com> <pm1ftc$1p6h$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fffdc66b-4a3d-4e88-b356-2f752e83655e@googlegroups.com>
Show all headers | View raw
On 2018-08-27 11:31 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
> On Monday, August 27, 2018 at 2:29:05 PM UTC-4, Alan Baker wrote:
>> On 2018-08-27 11:26 AM, thomas.e.elam@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 27, 2018 at 2:21:24 PM UTC-4, Alan Baker wrote:
>>>> On 2018-08-27 11:16 AM, thomas.e.elam@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, July 22, 2018 at 8:42:36 PM UTC-4, Arlen Holder wrote:
>>>>>> What are the common well-verified psychological traits of the typical iOS
>>>>>> poster on this newsgroup?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The question is a psychological one where the Apple Apologists have, for
>>>>>> decades, almost all exhibited the following common traits which have caused
>>>>>> endless discussions because Apple Apologists don't seem to like facts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here are the nine commonly exhibited traits of *all* the Apple Apologists:
>>>>>> * They're never purposefully helpful whenever they don't like the question
>>>>>> * They brazenly & repeatedly fabricate wholly imaginary iOS functionality
>>>>>> * They then exclaim that they told us many times how to do it! :)
>>>>>> * They always "just guess" where their credibility is worthless
>>>>>> * They almost never back up their statements with any referenced facts
>>>>>> * They incessantly play silly childish word games when faced with facts
>>>>>> * They consistently fabricate quoted content that never happened
>>>>>> * Then they respond to that imaginary quoted content as if it did!
>>>>>> * They consistently blame Android for the lack of functionality on iOS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's psychologically interesting is that in this post, Savageduck yet
>>>>>> again blames Android for an OP's inability to do what he wants using iOS!
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/ooCFANY5CAAJ>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The OP of that thread concurred, that it was Android's fault that he
>>>>>> couldn't copy an app from one iOS device to another!
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/7Qqc3f1dCAAJ>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Meanwhile, Jolly Roger yet again wholly fabricated imaginary iOS
>>>>>> functionality for the poor OP to attempt to follow (and fail), since both
>>>>>> nospam and Jolly Roger incessantly fabricate iOS functionality that just
>>>>>> doesn't exist, whenever they see a technical question that they don't like.
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/SGhljjBYCAAJ>
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/VqzlcQ0hCAAJ>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When the OP tried Jolly Roger's fabricated method, is it any surprise it
>>>>>> failed?
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/C78-NjwnCAAJ>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NOTE: Often Jolly Roger responds with hate-filled fifth-grade vitriol when
>>>>>> confronted with facts, but in this particular test thread, he remained calm
>>>>>> so we won't add that to the common traits.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, nospam not only fabricates imaginary iOS functionality:
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/Cf3bIIcQCAAJ>
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/1YHAnJEnCAAJ>
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/jsxtlTchCAAJ>
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/3naulH4cCAAJ>
>>>>>> But nospam also claims that he's told us how to do (what can't be done)
>>>>>> many times, and we just won't listen to him.
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/yk6sP4I2CAAJ>
>>>>>> And even better, nospam claims that people have been successful with their
>>>>>> imaginary iOS functioanlity!
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/HZYE3iscCAAJ>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yet, I told the OP it can't be done (because it can't be done).
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/7rHAL_QXCAAJ>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And so did sms, who is another credible poster on the iOS newsgroups who is
>>>>>> almost never wrong simply because he speaks facts. (Facts are funny that
>>>>>> way.)
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/u21p0MMaCAAJ>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Meanwhile, David Empson, the most knowedgeable and credible poster on the
>>>>>> iOs newsgroups by far, backed up what both sms and I said:
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.ipad/Tufx3qIBZBw/z3kVVoc-CAAJ>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hence, the question is a psychological one where the Apple Apologists have,
>>>>>> for decades, almost all exhibited the following common traits:
>>>>>> * They're never purposefully helpful whenever they don't like the question
>>>>>> * They brazenly & repeatedly fabricate wholly imaginary iOS functionality
>>>>>> * They then exclaim that they told us many times how to do it! :)
>>>>>> * They always "just guess" where their credibility is worthless
>>>>>> * They almost never back up their statements with any referenced facts
>>>>>> * They incessantly play silly childish word games when faced with facts
>>>>>> * They consistently fabricate quoted content that never happened
>>>>>> * Then they respond to that imaginary quoted content as if it did!
>>>>>> * They consistently blame Android for the lack of functionality on iOS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are those the common psychological traits of all the Apple Apologists?
>>>>>
>>>>> The facts are clear. I can do anything on my Moto Z that you can do on an iPhone. In some cases quicker and easier.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you tell everyone how many phones you've gone through in the
>>>> last few years to get to this point.
>>>>
>>>> Just so that people can judge your credibility.
>>>>
>>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Actually, I posted that just to see if you are still stalking me across Usenet. You bit on it, asshole Liarboy that you are.
>>>
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>> I'm "stalking" you because I read a group about Macs, Liarboy?
>>
>> This from the guy who carefully scours the net looking for my racing
>> results and some way he can spin them?
>>
>> LOLOLOLOLOLOLol
> 
> Yep, you jumped right on it!

Why wouldn't I, Liarboy?

You're spreading your FUD to knew groups that I've frequented for a long 
time.

How is that "stalking you across Usenet"?

> 
> Your racing results take no scouring. SCCBC.NET is quite easy to find.

Yet you went looking for them, didn't you?

Like you went looking for my "website"...

...only it was LinkedIn page.

:-)
Thread

csiph-web