Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #697834
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer |
| Date | 2018-08-09 20:50 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pkir1g$6d1$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <f1029a02-bfb8-4f4d-9442-85fa0a6b5c2b@googlegroups.com> <pkht7o$p1p$2@gioia.aioe.org> <f99e3d64-2eb5-4e00-aa6c-2747fcfc0f14@googlegroups.com> <pkhvng$ths$1@gioia.aioe.org> <8c71965d-8adc-4672-ad26-39021c47604f@googlegroups.com> |
On 8/9/2018 7:20 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 11:34:37 PM UTC+5:30, Sergio wrote: >> On 8/9/2018 12:52 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 10:52:05 PM UTC+5:30, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 8/9/2018 10:28 AM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 8:03:24 AM UTC+5:30, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> On 8/8/2018 12:22 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>> According to mathematician J. Doyne Farmer, in edge.org, in "Collective Awareness", he talks about economics, and building better economic models to predict the future. People play a central role in economics, and the idea that they behave rationally has been discredited. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is very difficult to predict the behaviour of people not acting logically, but acting emotionally with all their cognitive biases. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From my experience studying economics and physics, I must argue that the maths required to do even classical physics is a lot harder than mastering the basics of macroeconomics. However physics can give much better predictions than economics. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would argue that much greater mathematical skill is required in being a successful physicist, than a successful economist. However, top economists make more money than top physicists. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Abhinav Lal >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> a lot of physicists do stock market prediction as a Quant. Using math >>>>>> skills, not physics so much. Huge $$$ there. >>>>> >>>>> According to various sources, the median wages for economists and physicists is similar at about USD 100,000. However as I stated, top economists make more than top physicists. The highest earning top 10% of physicists earned over USD 165k, while the highest earning top 10% of economists earned over USD 180k. >>>>> >>>>> Abhinav Lal >>>>> Writer & Investor >>>>> >>>> >>>> yep, those closer to the money stream, make more money. (old saying in >>>> my country) >>> >>> I made a mistake in giving astronomers salaries instead of physicists salaries above. Physicists median is 120k, top 10% 190k. So physicists earn more than economists. >>> >>> But economists in Finance and Insurance average 125k. > > That should be Median not average. According to Quora, the best paying jobs in USA are held by medical professionals. > > Abhinav Lal > medical is rough, as Drs have to pay for malpractice insurance which is very steep. I knew on Dr who cleared $250k a year but had to pay $85K in insurance. Petroleum engineers make a lot of money too >>> >>> I do know that the top economists working for the biggest investment banks earn very high salaries. >>> >>> I apologise for my mistakes. >>> >>> Abhinav Lal >>> Writer & Investor >>> >> >> there are very few jobs for astronomers, few jobs for physicists. The >> statistics on how many jobs are online in US Gov somewhere, with salarie >> range. I consider math used by physiciscs harder than economist, but >> that is a vague generalization at best. >> >> stock brokers, or broker agents in Manhatten make well above $200k, I >> think they make $$ on commission sales and split part with the company, >> but they have to go find their own customers or get laid off. And their >> skills are not math, but relationship selling. >
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-08 10:22 -0700
Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-08 21:33 -0500
Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-09 08:28 -0700
Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-09 12:21 -0500
Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-09 10:52 -0700
Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-09 13:04 -0500
Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-09 13:12 -0500
Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-09 17:20 -0700
Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-09 20:50 -0500
csiph-web