Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #697675

Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer

From Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer
Date 2018-08-08 21:33 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <pkg95f$1m8q$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <95432b4f-06c1-4b3f-ae14-c352dc960d51@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 8/8/2018 12:22 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote:
> According to mathematician J. Doyne Farmer, in edge.org, in "Collective Awareness", he talks about economics, and building better economic models to predict the future.  People play a central role in economics, and the idea that they behave rationally has been discredited.
> 
> It is very difficult to predict the behaviour of people not acting logically, but acting emotionally with all their cognitive biases.
> 
> From my experience studying economics and physics, I must argue that the maths required to do even classical physics is a lot harder than mastering the basics of macroeconomics.  However physics can give much better predictions than economics.
> 
> I would argue that much greater mathematical skill is required in being a successful physicist, than a successful economist.  However, top economists make more money than top physicists.
> 
> 
> 
> Abhinav Lal
> 

a lot of physicists do stock market prediction as a Quant.  Using math
skills, not physics so much.  Huge $$$ there.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

"Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-08 10:22 -0700
  Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-08 21:33 -0500
    Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-09 08:28 -0700
      Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-09 12:21 -0500
        Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-09 10:52 -0700
          Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-09 13:04 -0500
            Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-09 13:12 -0500
            Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer alal65536@gmail.com - 2018-08-09 17:20 -0700
              Re: "Economics is a lot harder than physics, because people can think." J. Doyne Farmer Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-09 20:50 -0500

csiph-web