Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #462560
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: What is the cause of gravity? |
| Date | 2018-06-25 14:23 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pgqtss$hu1$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <c5ce7d06-c226-4c58-9feb-3095bef37e4c@googlegroups.com> <pgor43$19ga$1@gioia.aioe.org> <f7709ff9-583c-4f0e-9951-a18e5eea0550@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Sunday, June 24, 2018 at 3:23:51 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> What is the cause of gravity? >>> >>> Attempts to answer this questions are as follows: >>> >>> 1. Newton’s gravitational theory: >>> Newton’s gravitation equation describes the effects of gravity on >>> interacting objects. But he had no clue on the cause of gravity, on why >>> the interacting objects are attracted to each other. >> >> However many right after him, including Gauss stepped in for Newton and >> described it in terms of a physical field. >> >>> >>> 2. Einstein’s gravitational theory, the General Relativity Theory (GRT): >>> GRT says that interacting objects follows the curvature of space-time but >>> that is just a description the path being followed by the interacting >>> objects. No cause why objects follow the curvature of spacetime because >>> spacetime is not a material medium. It is a math construct. >> >> Not true. The spacetime that GR models is a physical entity, not just a >> math construct. Not everything that is physical is material. This has been >> known for centuries. > > If spacetime is a physical entity, please describe....BTW, assertion is > not a valid description. Ken, that just isn’t going to happen on a newsgroup. All you are ever going to get on Usenet are short, undetailed responses. Explanations do not come here. They never have. Books are the only option. >> >>> >>> 3. Quantum field theory of graviton: >>> The Quantum field theory of gravity says that gravity between interacting >>> objects is mediated by the hypothetical particle called the graviton. >>> However the equations of graviton give rise to all sorts of infinities >>> and thus they are not normalizable to give GRT. >> >> This isn’t entirely accurate either. There are graviton theories which are >> not customary QFTs but which exhibit no infinities. > > Why they are not adopted by physicists? They ARE! Catch up. > >> >>> >>> 4. Model Mechanics theory of gravity, the DTG: >>> A paper on DTG is available in the following link: >>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf >>> DTG posits that gravity is a composite force and that the causes of >>> gravity between the earth and the moon are as follows: >>> >>> 1. The earth and the moon are expanding in the same direction in a >>> structured and elastic medium, called the E-Matrix, occupying all of >>> space as the universe expands. This causes an attractive EM force between them. >>> >>> 2. The structure of the E-Matrix is divergent. The earth and the moon are >>> confined to follow the divergent structure of the E-Matrix as the >>> universe expands. This gives rise to a repulsive effect (force) between them. >>> >>> 3. Newton’s Gravity force equation is the combined result of the above >>> opposing forces. That's why gravity is so weak compared to the EM force alone. >>> >>> 4. As you can see the combination of these opposing forces is the reason >>> why the moon is able to maintain a stable orbit around the earth. That >>> means that the assertion by physicists in this NG that gravity is a >>> single attractive force and that this single attractive force of gravity >>> is enabling the moon to maintain a stable orbit around the earth is a bogus assertion. >>> >> Your idea has no calculations of any numbers, which is a prerequisite of a >> theory. So yours is not a theory. > > You don’t know the meaning of the word “theory”. In any case I present > the cause of gravity. > > No, YOU don’t know the meaning of a theory. Remember, you’ve read NOTHING. Remember, you don’t even know how the scientific method works. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What is the cause of gravity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-24 09:41 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-24 16:52 +0000
Re: What is the cause of gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:23 +0000
Re: What is the cause of gravity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-25 06:07 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 14:23 +0000
Re: What is the cause of gravity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-25 12:01 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 20:40 +0000
Re: What is the cause of gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 13:45 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-25 05:57 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 09:40 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-06-25 11:24 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-26 06:51 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 11:05 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-26 17:19 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-27 15:05 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 07:37 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-28 11:36 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 15:36 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-06-28 17:11 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 13:41 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 15:12 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 15:21 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 17:18 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-06-28 07:43 -0700
Re: What is the cause of gravity? Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 08:32 -0700
csiph-web