Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.math > #414495

Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

From Michael Moroney <moroney@TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups sci.math, sci.physics
Subject Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test
Date 2018-06-03 03:08 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <pevm3r$j7v$2@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References <4d12be56-861f-4b78-9722-6b4fa820e2a0@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Archimedes Plutonium fails:

>Here is an example from the Internet in sci.math of Ad Hominem of a writer
>who hates the person he is talking to, and no matter what the topic is,
>the message is always the same-- I hate your guts.

>On Monday, May 28, 2018 at 2:00:46 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> But can you tell us what is wrong with the following proof that the
>> ellipse is a conic section? After all, you say the ellipse is not a
>> conic section and what Archimedes Plutonium says is true is true, right?

<several other ad hominems by Archie snipped>

Still haven't learned not to attack me?

Back to sci.math | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test Michael Moroney <moroney@TheWorld.com> - 2018-06-03 03:08 +0000

csiph-web