Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #414365

Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Archimedes Plutonium fails:

>Here is an example from the Internet in sci.math of Ad Hominem of a writer 
>who hates the person he is talking to, and no matter what the topic is, 
>the message is always the same-- I hate your guts.

>On Monday, May 28, 2018 at 2:00:46 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> But can you tell us what is wrong with the following proof that the
>> ellipse is a conic section? After all, you say the ellipse is not a
>> conic section and what Archimedes Plutonium says is true is true, right?

<several other ad hominems by Archie snipped>

>You're the one doing the ad hominem here, Archie. And I still see you
>still haven't learned not to attack me.

Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-01 11:38 +0000
  Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-06-01 12:11 -0700

csiph-web