Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #687260

Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option.

From Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
Subject Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option.
Date 2018-05-26 23:34 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <pecqut$v0b$17@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (10 earlier) <sOeOC.244781$1e7.31777@fx38.iad> <pece9q$v0b$5@dont-email.me> <gifjgd98pdksong88hmg6vmqeqrm9tnhta@4ax.com> <pecn0n$v0b$14@dont-email.me> <ukojgdte07k0io5v0mvu54c9c15c13561c@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:42:26 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:

> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:27:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 14:07:05 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 19:58:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>melt!
>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:11:09 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/25/2018 11:41 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:26:34 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 22:16:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:01:53 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 21:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:41:33 -0600, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/25/2018 11:55 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/25/2018 1:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The point behind my question is whether it's evolution of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> species,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or merely adaptation within a species, that has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>> observed in the lab.  No one denies that species can adapt. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The question is whether the former, the actual evolution of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one species into a separate and distinct species, has ever
>>>>>>>>>>>>> been observed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And the answer is "yes":
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/lab-experiment-
>>speciation/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "A groundbreaking lab experiment proves that speciation, in
>>>>>>>>>>>> which one species splits into two distinct ones, is most
>>>>>>>>>>>> definitely a real thing."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It looks more like someone is playing fast and loose with the
>>>>>>>>>>> definition of a new species.  That wouldn't be surprising.
>>>>>>>>>>> Biologists don't even have a universally accepted definition
>>>>>>>>>>> of "species".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's funny, because to me it looks more like some butthurt
>>>>>>>>>> creationist kook is playing fast and loose with the
>>>>>>>>>> questionable debating tactic of goalpost-moving and
>>>>>>>>>> no-true-Scotsmanning.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The fact is you really don't know if we were created or climbed
>>>>>>>>> out of the muck.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually, I do.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then state what it is and show proof.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> #include <std_evolution_textbook.h>
>>>>>
>>>>> He said, "proof" not "propaganda" Nads.
>>>>
>>>>The proof is all of the scientific experiments and observations and
>>>>statistical regressions in the papers that are the basis for, and
>>>>referenced in, the textbook, kooky.
>>>
>>> You said you had proof yet you fail to produce it.
>>
>>There is a marvellous proof which this Usenet post is too small to
>>contain, hence I incorporated it by reference. What did you expect me to
>>do instead, paste in hundreds of megabytes of scientific papers
>>published over a period exceeding a century, all so that you could just
>>snip and ignore it all and toss off some phrase of dismissal such as
>>"fake news" and continue to believe your fairy-tales anyway?
>>
>>I have met the burden of proof. You refuse to look at it. You have
>>effectively conceded the argument by doing so. I declare victory. End of
>>thread.
> 
> So what you are saying is that you hope evolution is right but you
> really don't know.

No, that is NOT what I'm saying. Your reading comprehension skills are 
shit.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 10:44 -0400
  Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 10:47 -0700
    Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 18:46 +0000
      Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:17 -0700
        Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 20:41 +0000
          Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 13:47 -0700
          Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 15:57 -0700
          An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 14:15 -0400
            Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 19:32 +0000
              Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 20:16 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. OT de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-19 10:25 +1000
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-18 22:09 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 19:16 -0700
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:02 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-19 12:09 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:44 +0000
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:28 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:37 +0000
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 20:42 -0700
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:07 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-19 12:35 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:40 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 22:22 +0000
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 21:34 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-20 03:15 +0000
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 12:18 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-20 12:38 -0400
              Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:42 +0000
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:26 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-02 11:27 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:45 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-04 09:26 -0400
                Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 15:05 +0100
      Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 16:42 -0400
        Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 00:30 +0000
          Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:34 -0700
            Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-17 05:07 +0000
              Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 19:48 +0000
          Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:47 -0700
          Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 22:44 -0400
      Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-17 12:34 -0400
        Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 10:01 -0700
          Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-05-17 12:10 -0500
          Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 13:28 -0400
            Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
        Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 19:49 +0000
          Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-20 10:52 -0400
            Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 12:23 -0400
            Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-20 12:26 -0400
              "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-20 10:01 -0700
                Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 23:38 -0400
                Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-21 00:11 -0400
                Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 04:33 +0000
                Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-20 23:33 -0700
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-21 07:22 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 12:10 -0400
                Nature herself punishes perverts. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-21 09:33 -0700
                Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-21 18:16 +0000
                Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:03 +0000
                Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 13:04 -0700
                Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:29 +0000
                Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 15:47 -0700
                Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-21 19:14 -0400
                Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 16:16 -0700
                Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 20:19 -0400
                Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:11 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-21 09:08 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-21 09:31 -0700
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 12:37 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:05 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 13:05 -0700
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:24 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:15 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:30 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
                Gregory Hall condems himself. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 10:14 -0700
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:21 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:31 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-24 22:39 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-24 16:01 -0700
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:50 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-24 18:07 -0700
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:51 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:37 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 04:47 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-25 07:42 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:49 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:40 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-25 11:08 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 17:45 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:53 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:11 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-26 11:41 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 21:49 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-26 11:42 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:47 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 10:32 -0700
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Leo Sgouros <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 10:55 -0700
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:25 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-25 00:09 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-25 00:32 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 21:52 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 04:49 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:42 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-25 05:34 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 00:03 -0600
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:57 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:24 -0600
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:55 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:41 -0600
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 21:50 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:15 -0700
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 22:16 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 20:15 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:03 -0700
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:34 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 03:41 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 06:39 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:14 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:57 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:50 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:11 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:58 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:54 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:28 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:27 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:34 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:39 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:47 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 02:00 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:32 +0000
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:29 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-25 07:49 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:58 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:58 -0400
                We can't help them, the damage has been done. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-25 11:41 -0700
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 12:07 -0400
                Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-24 09:49 -0700
              Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
                Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:26 -0400
            Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:44 -0600
              Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:03 -0700
              Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
                Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:27 -0400
                Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
                Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:26 -0700
  Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:14 -0400

csiph-web