Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #686785
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Questions about quarks |
| Date | 2018-05-23 12:45 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <pe3npe$15fu$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <f9ddc7ea-bc7d-4ce1-b671-b108ad15dff6@googlegroups.com> <pdvcq8$3hf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b9994456-338e-49d9-8df6-fe00f55d051e@googlegroups.com> <pe1bcv$164b$1@gioia.aioe.org> <aab7d447-d7bf-41b2-81c6-4854af678f0d@googlegroups.com> |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > Odd > “Discussed before. Electrons have kinetic energy and no trajectory. I know > you try to shove those two statements into your familiar world and it ..” > > You put words together that seem to be contradictory, Odd. Can you > explain this a different way, please? Not contradictory. Just different from your everyday experience. > No trajectory means, it isn’t moving in any direction? No, that’s not what it means. A trajectory means that at any time t, you can tell me where it is with coordinates x, y, z, and therefore you can track its location through time. Electrons are moving but you cannot follow a trajectory. You know they are moving for several reasons. One of them is that we can measure their kinetic energy. > Kinetic energy means, parts are spinning, perhaps? No. Translational kinetic energy is different than rotational kinetic energy. Don’t confuse them. > Please express this in a different way. > > Are you saying that electrons are windmills? Not at all. Wrong direction. Off the road and into the weeds. > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Questions about quarks Brian Ghilliotti <zendorian9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 14:02 -0700
Re: Questions about quarks Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 21:13 +0000
Re: Questions about quarks john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 07:18 -0700
Re: Questions about quarks Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-22 15:01 +0000
Re: Questions about quarks john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 04:54 -0700
Re: Questions about quarks Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:45 +0000
Re: Questions about quarks john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 08:14 -0700
Re: Questions about quarks Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 17:05 +0000
Re: Questions about quarks john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 10:29 -0700
Re: Questions about quarks Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 18:59 +0000
Re: Questions about quarks moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-25 19:00 +0000
Re: Questions about quarks "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:23 -0700
Re: Questions about quarks "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-25 15:56 -0700
Re: Questions about quarks moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-22 16:13 +0000
Re: Questions about quarks poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-22 16:21 -0700
csiph-web