Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #457988

Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified.

From Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified.
Date 2018-05-15 20:30 +0200
Organization news.eternal-september.org
Message-ID <pdf905$41e$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <dcbb54ad-94fa-4083-8df6-2d8b9136200f@googlegroups.com> <bcda5d12-c2b2-4bae-b184-43c0122609c0@googlegroups.com> <b19a6bbc-80b9-47d3-9016-bc5b8445f5d6@googlegroups.com> <pdf401$cu$1@dont-email.me> <85ffc87f-8469-4bd7-b555-e8b0d429bfe3@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

chanrasjid@gmail.com Wrote in message:
> On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 1:05:07 AM UTC+8, Libor Striz wrote:


>> You are very uncritical with acceptance of the mentioned article.
>> There is bunch of nonsenses.
>>
> "nonsense" is rather relative.

Only for relativists, not for physicists.


>> But they have high standards to accept posting or discussion.
>>
> "high standards" again is rather relative.

Well, relatively to your standards, as I follow you for long time,
 they are very high.


>> Libor Striz aka Poutnik ( a pilgrim/wanderer/wayfarer)
>> 
>> "Humour is the only effective weapon against stupidity."
>> Miloš Forman
>>
> "stupidity" is again rather relative!
>  

 "The shot goose has the loudest honking."

All your approach is confrontation and argumentative, the proper
 trolling behaviour, putting aside scientific approach.

I will not follow this thread.

-- 
Libor Striz aka Poutnik ( a pilgrim/wanderer/wayfarer)

"Humour is the only effective weapon against stupidity."
Miloš Forman


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2018-05-15 01:16 -0700
  Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 08:44 -0700
    Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2018-05-15 09:28 -0700
      Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:05 +0200
        Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:08 +0200
        Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2018-05-15 11:01 -0700
          Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-05-15 20:30 +0200
            Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-15 19:14 +0000
      Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 22:15 -0700
        Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2018-05-16 07:31 -0700
          Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:57 -0700
          Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 16:09 -0700
            Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2018-05-16 16:45 -0700
              Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 21:21 -0700
                Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2018-05-17 01:15 -0700
                Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 12:33 -0700
                Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2018-05-18 01:28 -0700
                Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2018-05-18 02:28 -0700
  Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Dan Riley <dan131riley@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 19:02 -0400
    Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2018-05-15 22:24 -0700
      Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Dan Riley <dan131riley@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 10:11 -0400
        Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2018-05-16 07:37 -0700
          Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 15:23 +0000
            Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-05-16 21:12 -0700
              Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 12:22 +0000
                Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-05-20 00:17 -0700
          Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-05-16 13:58 -0700
            Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-05-16 14:20 -0700
              Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-19 18:45 +0000
                Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-05-19 21:15 -0700
  Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2018-05-19 06:11 -0700
    Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 16:01 +0000
  Re: Mass-energy equivalence of Emc2 not verified. paul jark <jarkpaulsmith@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 13:31 -0700

csiph-web