Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #165138
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10, comp.periphs.printers, alt.comp.hardware |
| Subject | Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? |
| Date | 2023-01-02 12:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <pata8jxkrn.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink) |
| References | <rqo4rh16l1qraa778lnt2a13qqcc7l6bnj@4ax.com> <tou0m6$13ir$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 2023-01-02 08:21, R.Wieser wrote: > "micky" <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> wrote in message > news:rqo4rh16l1qraa778lnt2a13qqcc7l6bnj@4ax.com... >> Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? >> >> If I set a printer's network IP address, network mask, and Gateway >> and mark it STATIC, does that make it less likely that the printer >> will forget what the settings are? Less likely than if it was done >> with AUTO/APIPA or DHCP? > > I think you're not asking the right question. Its not about that printer > forgetting its settings, but if its DHCP request (for an IP) is answered. > If not, than either it can't be part of the network, or APIPA kicks in and > loads a earlier provided "fall back" IP. > > But yes, setting a static IP should result in the printer not "forgetting" > its IP settings. Yes. micky, please do set an static network at the physical printer. -- Cheers, Carlos.
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2023-01-02 00:21 -0500
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> - 2023-01-02 08:15 +0100
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-01-02 12:54 +0100
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2023-01-02 08:21 +0100
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-01-02 12:55 +0100
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-01-02 10:10 -0500
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2023-01-02 16:28 +0100
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-01-02 10:59 -0500
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2023-01-02 17:36 +0100
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2023-01-02 12:16 -0500
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2023-01-02 19:12 +0100
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2023-01-02 02:18 -0600
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2023-01-02 07:08 -0700
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2023-01-02 12:09 -0600
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? Graham J <nobody@nowhere.co.uk> - 2023-01-02 11:23 +0000
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2023-01-02 13:01 +0000
Re: Is a Static network connection more static than Auto? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-01-02 14:33 +0100
csiph-web