Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #12140
| From | Unknown <dog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: composition ? piping |
| Date | 2014-09-21 13:09 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <pan.2014.09.21.13.15.39@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <pan.2014.08.21.20.56.55@gmail.com> <871ts8wo4d.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org> |
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:16:50 -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Unknown writes: >> cp A b.wav; aplay b.wav ; rm b.wav >> aplay `<process file A as fileb.wav would be processed> ? > > aplay, like any other Unix or Linux program, doesn't give a damn about > suffixes. "." is just a character and it and the characters after it > are just parts of the filename. "aplay A" will work fine. I don't promote name-dropping; and <fileTYPES> are often detectable from their initial bytes [? magic numbers?]. But your statement implies that job.sh SHOULD be handled the same as jobDOG is 'not good'. That loses a complete dimension. An extreme case is my ChineseButtonAudioPlayer: it doesn't even distinguish between directory-nodes. Apparently it just examines all the files [including <dir-pointers>] and if it finds one of the File-types-that-it-plays, it plays that file. I know for a fact that `mc` pays special attention to <file extentions>.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
composition ? piping Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2014-08-21 20:50 +0000
Re: composition ? piping Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2014-08-22 13:39 +0000
Re: composition ? piping John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2014-08-22 10:16 -0500
Re: composition ? piping Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-08-22 17:13 +0000
Re: composition ? piping Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 13:09 +0000
Re: composition ? piping Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2014-09-21 20:18 +0000
Re: composition ? piping Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2014-09-22 13:39 +0000
Re: composition ? piping Michael Baeuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2014-09-26 08:26 +0000
Re: composition ? piping Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2014-09-26 13:01 -0400
Re: composition ? piping Michael Baeuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2014-09-29 08:54 +0000
Re: composition ? piping Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-09-29 15:47 +0000
Re: composition ? piping John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2014-09-29 11:41 -0500
Re: composition ? piping "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2014-09-27 12:49 +0200
Re: composition ? piping Bill Marcum <bill.marcum57@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-25 14:58 -0400
csiph-web