Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #12140

Re: composition ? piping

From Unknown <dog@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: composition ? piping
Date 2014-09-21 13:09 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <pan.2014.09.21.13.15.39@gmail.com> (permalink)
References <pan.2014.08.21.20.56.55@gmail.com> <871ts8wo4d.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:16:50 -0500, John Hasler wrote:

> Unknown writes:
>> cp A b.wav; aplay b.wav ; rm b.wav
>> aplay `<process file A as fileb.wav would be processed> ?
> 
> aplay, like any other Unix or Linux program, doesn't give a damn about
> suffixes.  "." is just a character and it and the characters after it
> are just parts of the filename.  "aplay A" will work fine.

I don't promote name-dropping; and <fileTYPES> are often detectable
from their initial bytes [? magic numbers?].

But your statement implies that job.sh SHOULD be handled the same
as jobDOG is 'not good'. That loses a complete dimension.

An extreme case is my ChineseButtonAudioPlayer: it
doesn't even distinguish between directory-nodes.
Apparently it just examines all the files [including <dir-pointers>]
and if it finds one of the File-types-that-it-plays, it plays
that file.

I know for a fact that `mc` pays special attention to <file extentions>.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

composition ? piping Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2014-08-21 20:50 +0000
  Re: composition ? piping Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2014-08-22 13:39 +0000
  Re: composition ? piping John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2014-08-22 10:16 -0500
    Re: composition ? piping Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-08-22 17:13 +0000
    Re: composition ? piping Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 13:09 +0000
      Re: composition ? piping Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2014-09-21 20:18 +0000
        Re: composition ? piping Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2014-09-22 13:39 +0000
          Re: composition ? piping Michael Baeuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2014-09-26 08:26 +0000
            Re: composition ? piping Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2014-09-26 13:01 -0400
              Re: composition ? piping Michael Baeuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2014-09-29 08:54 +0000
                Re: composition ? piping Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-09-29 15:47 +0000
                Re: composition ? piping John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2014-09-29 11:41 -0500
            Re: composition ? piping "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2014-09-27 12:49 +0200
      Re: composition ? piping Bill Marcum <bill.marcum57@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-25 14:58 -0400

csiph-web