Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #32671
| From | Unknown <dog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | where's colorforth for LINUX? |
| Date | 2014-07-26 07:13 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <pan.2014.07.26.07.18.25@gmail.com> (permalink) |
google lead me to sourceforge; so I put the URL which didn't suggest being a binary, in my list of <append fetched text to ColorForth:File>. And it dumped a fat M$loth executable there! ColoUr is efficient for providing an extra dimention for complex-problem solving. We have evolved as visual-creatures. Heads-up: selecting from menues, is how it should be. Tapping messages to the-little-man-in-the box is absurd. To facilitate human-reading [which we paid schooling costs for] we should just select the syntactically valid choice at the present context. A bit like spreadsheets. Unpaired-brackets should be as rare as a pencil-without-lead. Nesting of brackets should show the contents in alternate colours, by default. Using a new computer language should be like visiting a new town; which has the same rules: like selecting 1-of-a-zillion telephone numbers from the directory. I suspect colorforth uses some of these ideas? ETHOberon from the 90's does -- with great effect.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
where's colorforth for LINUX? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2014-07-26 07:13 +0000 Re: where's colorforth for LINUX? Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2014-07-26 12:45 +0100
csiph-web